Does History Repeat Itself? 2018 S&P500 and 2020 Nasdaq Fractals

In this post, I will take a purely technical approach to the Nasdaq's weekly chart, using fractals from the S&P500's 2018 price movement.


2018, S&P 500
- On the left side, we can see the weekly chart for the S&P500 Index (SPX)
- The index was at an uptrend, moving above the Ichimoku cloud
- Due to fear, uncertainty, and doubt in the global economy, a flash crash was triggered
- The index tested the 200 Simple Moving Average (SMA), and bounced right back up, forming a V shape recovery
- At the bottom, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) was also at oversold territories
- During the quick recovery, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) formed a golden cross, confirming the uptrend
- Prices seemed to have topped out once again, after forming a double top
- While the MACD was showing convergence, the bearish histograms were not big enough to provide confirmation for a potential trend reversal
- Eventually, prices broke through resistance, and continued to rally upwards

2020, Nasdaq Index
- On the right side, we can see the weekly chart for the Nasdaq Index (IXIC)
- The overall setup is very similar to that of SPX in 2018, including the Ichimoku clouds
- The index bounced on the 200 SMA
- While it bottomed out temporarily, the RSI reached oversold territories
- Just like the S&P, the MACD provided a lagging confirmation
- The current death crosses that have taken place did not demonstrate significant bearish momentum
- The bearish histograms are extremely small, and the death crosses almost immediately get negated
- We are currently seeing a double top form on IXIC's weekly
- If this fractal turns out to be correct, this would be a phase of consolidation before breaking out to rally further

Reminder
- The stock market is not driven by technical factors. This is merely an analysis taking a technical approach to interpreting the current price action on IXIC's weekly chart
- The stock market is unaffected by certain technical indicators. Divergences and golden and death crosses of oscillators get easily negated
- It's important to note that for both market situations, the drop was caused by external factors - fear, uncertainty, and doubt induced by external factors
- The fundamentals of the companies that constitute the index did not change much
Nasdaq's Breakout Explained

- For more information on the fundamental aspects, check out my other analysis on Nasdaq's breakout

If you like this analysis, please make sure to like the post, and follow for more quality content!
I would also appreciate it if you could leave a comment below with some original insight.
Chart PatternsFractalTechnical IndicatorsNasdaq Composite Index CFDnasdaqsnp500SPX (S&P 500 Index)Technical AnalysisTrend Analysis

🔴 Premium Newsletter: mikebwang.com/newsletter
🟢 TA Education: mikebwang.com/tacourse
🟡 Community: mikebwang.com/theinsiders
🟣 YouTube: youtube.com/investingwithmike
🔵 Twitter: @michael_b_wang
Aussi sur:

Publications connexes

Clause de non-responsabilité