XRS Swing Failure Patterns + AlertsXRS Swing Failure Patterns + Alerts is a modified version of the original LuxAlgo Swing Failure Pattern script.
The original SFP detection logic is credited to LuxAlgo. This XRS version keeps the core swing failure pattern concept while adding small modifications, styling adjustments, and dedicated alert conditions for multiple timeframes.
This indicator identifies bullish and bearish Swing Failure Patterns, where price sweeps a prior swing high or swing low and then closes back through the level. These patterns are commonly used to identify potential liquidity sweeps, failed breakouts, stop runs, and reversal areas.
Features include:
• Bullish and bearish SFP detection
• Swing length customization
• Optional volume validation
• Optional lower-timeframe volume validation
• Swing lines
• Confirmation lines
• Swing failure wick markers
• SFP labels
• Optional dashboard
• Alerts when an SFP prints on 1m, 5m, 15m, 1h, 4h, and 1D timeframes
This version was modified by XRStrading / chasingkilowatts to make the script better suited for discretionary trading workflows, especially for traders who use liquidity sweeps, session highs/lows, VWAP, order flow, and auction-market concepts.
Original Author: LuxAlgo
Modifications: XRStrading / chasingkilowatts
This script is based on original LuxAlgo work and remains subject to the original attribution and license terms.
Disclaimer: This script is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Trading involves risk. Use at your own discretion.
Indicateur
Indicateur
Acceptance Failure Path Map [AGPro Series]Acceptance Failure Path Map
🧠 Core Idea
Did price truly accept beyond a market boundary, or did that acceptance fail and create a new reaction path?
📌 Overview / What it does
Acceptance Failure Path Map is a market-structure visualization tool designed to study acceptance, failed acceptance, reclaim attempts, and continuation behavior around a defined reference range.
The script maps an acceptance band, detects whether price holds above or below that band, and highlights when accepted price fails back through the boundary. It produces compact labels, a centered path zone, right-side state tags, and an AG Pro panel that summarizes the current acceptance context.
It does not predict price direction, automate decisions, or claim that any acceptance event must continue. Its purpose is to make acceptance quality easier to read.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who want to understand whether a move is being accepted by the market or rejected after a temporary push beyond structure.
Many breakout tools mark only the breakout event. This script focuses on what happens after the breakout: acceptance, failure, reclaim pressure, and continuation risk.
The design supports a patient, context-first workflow where the trader reads the path of price around a boundary instead of reacting to a single candle.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on breakout signals, support and resistance touches, or simple range breaks.
This script does NOT treat every break as meaningful acceptance.
Instead, it builds a path map around acceptance quality, failure timing, reclaim behavior, and current risk state. The result is a cleaner view of whether price is holding acceptance or losing it.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script builds a reference range from recent market structure and applies an ATR-based buffer to reduce noise.
2. Reference Mapping
It defines upper and lower acceptance boundaries and tracks whether price closes beyond them for the required number of bars.
3. Reaction Evaluation
After acceptance appears, the script monitors whether price fails back through the boundary, attempts reclaim, or holds continuation.
4. Visual Output
The chart displays an acceptance path zone, event labels, right-side state tags, and a panel summarizing the current condition.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones show the current acceptance path area around the active boundary.
Labels highlight acceptance above, acceptance below, acceptance failure, reclaim tests, and held acceptance.
Colors separate bullish acceptance, bearish acceptance, neutral failure risk, and reclaim context.
The panel shows the current path state, acceptance side, failure risk, path quality, reference range, active boundary, and next context.
🚦 Signals & States
• ACCEPT ABOVE → Price has accepted above the reference boundary.
• ACCEPT BELOW → Price has accepted below the reference boundary.
• ACCEPT FAIL → Accepted price failed back through the boundary within the failure window.
• RECLAIM TEST → Price is testing reclaim after a failed acceptance event.
• ACCEPT HELD → Acceptance remained valid after the failure window.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when the script detects acceptance above, acceptance below, acceptance failure, or reclaim testing.
These alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions, entry signals, or guaranteed outcomes.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The context becomes stronger when acceptance quality, distance from the reference range, participation, and follow-through direction align.
If acceptance appears without follow-through or quickly returns through the boundary, the failure context becomes more important.
📊 When to Use
• After range breaks
• Around support and resistance transitions
• During breakout retests
• When price is attempting to hold above or below a major boundary
• When evaluating whether market structure is accepted or rejected
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely illiquid markets
• Very noisy low-timeframe candles
• News-driven spikes with unstable spreads
• Markets with no meaningful reference range
• Situations where a single indicator is being used without broader context
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Reference Range Length → controls how much structure is used to build the acceptance boundary.
• Acceptance Bars → controls how many closes are required before acceptance is recognized.
• Failure Window → controls how quickly accepted price must fail back through the boundary.
• Boundary Buffer ATR → adjusts the buffer around the reference range.
• Label and Panel Font Size → adjust chart readability.
• Visible Band Bars and Band Projection Bars → control how the acceptance zone appears on the chart.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed for a premium, clean chart view.
The panel provides the current summary. The acceptance zone carries the main story. Labels are compact and spaced to avoid hiding candles.
The visual hierarchy is intentionally simple: zone first, current state second, event labels third.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the AG Pro panel to identify the current path state.
2. Check whether price is above, below, or inside the acceptance path zone.
3. Review recent labels to understand whether acceptance held, failed, or reclaimed.
4. Compare the current failure risk and path quality with broader market context.
5. Use alerts only as attention markers for further review.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Acceptance is stronger when price remains outside the boundary with follow-through.
Acceptance failure is more meaningful when price quickly returns through the boundary after appearing accepted.
Reclaim tests should be interpreted as context changes, not automatic reversal signals.
Held acceptance suggests the market is continuing to respect the accepted side, but it still requires confirmation from broader structure.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
It is not financial advice.
It is not an automated trading system.
It does not provide guaranteed buy or sell signals.
It does not replace risk management, market context, or independent analysis.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Acceptance behavior can look different across timeframes.
High volatility can create temporary false readings.
Low-liquidity markets may produce unstable boundary behavior.
The script is rule-based and depends on the selected settings, symbol behavior, and chart timeframe.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Acceptance and failure are closely related to market structure, liquidity reaction, and participant commitment.
When price breaks a boundary but cannot hold it, the failed side may become the more important context.
When price accepts and holds, the market may be showing stronger directional commitment.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price accepts above a range and holds beyond the failure window, the chart may show an ACCEPT HELD context.
When price accepts above a boundary but quickly closes back below it, the script may mark ACCEPT FAIL.
When price returns back toward a failed boundary, the script may show a RECLAIM TEST state.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGPro Series tools are built to visualize market context without turning analysis into prediction.
The goal is to make structure, risk, and reaction quality easier to observe in real time.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can guarantee market direction, timing, or outcome.
This tool provides structured visual context only.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own decisions, risk management, and position sizing.
This script does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading results.
📚 Educational Note
Use this script as a learning and analysis tool for studying acceptance, failed acceptance, reclaim pressure, and continuation behavior around market boundaries.
Indicateur
Failed Continuation Trap Map [AGPro Series]Failed Continuation Trap Map
🧠 Core Idea
Did a continuation attempt fail strongly enough to trap traders and create pressure in the opposite direction?
📌 Overview / What it does
Failed Continuation Trap Map is a rule-based price-action and market-structure visualization tool designed to study failed continuation attempts.
The script identifies trend-aligned continuation attempts, maps the attempted breakout zone, evaluates whether the move fails back through that zone, and highlights when trapped longs or trapped shorts may create opposite pressure.
It does not predict reversals, automate trades, or guarantee that a failed continuation will produce follow-through. It is a structured decision-support map for continuation failure, trap behavior, and opposite-pressure context.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
Many breakout and continuation tools focus on whether price moved beyond a level.
This script was built to answer a more selective question:
Did the continuation attempt fail in a way that changes the market narrative?
The design goal is to help traders read failed continuation as a trap context instead of treating every rejection as a reversal signal.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on breakouts, pullbacks, continuation signals, or reversal labels.
This script does NOT label every failed move as a trap.
Instead, it waits for a trend-aligned continuation attempt, tracks the attempt zone, evaluates failure quality, maps the trap pocket, and checks whether opposite pressure confirms after trapped participants are created.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Continuation Bias Detection
The script uses fast and slow EMAs to define the active continuation bias.
2. Attempt Mapping
When price attempts continuation beyond recent structure, the script records the attempt level and builds an attempt zone.
3. Failure Evaluation
After the attempt, the script watches a defined failure window to detect rejection back through the attempt level.
4. Trap and Pressure Scoring
Trap quality uses rejection wick behavior, relative volume, and failure timing.
5. Visual Output
The chart displays the attempt zone, trap pocket, opposite-pressure rail, centered trap label, event labels, right-side tags, alerts, and a compact AG Pro decision panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Attempt Zone = the area around the continuation level where breakout or continuation participants may enter.
Trap Pocket = the area where failed continuation can create trapped participants.
Opposite-Pressure Rail = the level used to read whether the failed continuation is turning into stronger pressure against the attempt.
Centered Trap Label = the main visual anchor inside the active trap pocket.
Event Labels = compact labels for attempts, long traps, short traps, and pressure confirmation.
Right-Side Tags = current trap state, attempt level, and pressure quality.
Panel = summarizes trap state, attempt type, trapped side, trap quality, pressure quality, next context, and timeframe.
🚦 Signals & States
• ATTEMPT ACTIVE → price attempted continuation and is still inside the failure evaluation window.
• TRAP ACTIVE → the continuation attempt failed back through the attempt level.
• OPPOSITE PRESSURE → price confirmed pressure away from the failed continuation attempt.
• CONTINUATION HOLD → the attempt is holding beyond the continuation zone.
• ATTEMPT EXPIRED → the attempt did not create a timely failure or pressure signal.
• WAIT ATTEMPT → no valid continuation attempt is active.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when a major continuation-failure state appears.
• Continuation Attempt → price attempted continuation beyond recent structure.
• Failed Continuation Trap → continuation attempt failed back through the attempt zone with trap quality.
• Opposite Pressure Confirmed → opposite pressure confirmed after a failed continuation attempt.
Alerts are attention markers, not trade instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The context becomes stronger when:
• Continuation bias is clear
• Price attempts continuation beyond recent structure
• The attempt fails back through the zone quickly
• Rejection wick quality is strong
• Relative volume supports participation
• Opposite-pressure rail confirms after the trap
• The panel state agrees with the chart labels
If these elements do not align, the script avoids forcing a trap interpretation.
📊 When to Use
• Breakout failure analysis
• Failed continuation review
• Trend continuation trap studies
• Intraday and swing market-structure analysis
• Crypto, forex, stocks, and index markets
• 1H, 4H, and daily charts
• Markets where continuation attempts are common and readable
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low-liquidity symbols
• Extremely sideways markets with no continuation bias
• News-driven candles that distort rejection quality
• Ultra-low timeframes with excessive noise
• Markets where recent structure is too compressed to define a clean attempt zone
• Situations where a single failed attempt should not be treated as a standalone decision
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Fast EMA Length → defines the faster continuation-bias component.
• Slow EMA Length → confirms the broader continuation direction.
• ATR Length → normalizes attempt zones, trap pockets, labels, and failure levels.
• Continuation Breakout Lookback → defines recent structure used to identify continuation attempts.
• Failure Evaluation Window → controls how long after an attempt the script can classify failure.
• Attempt Zone ATR → controls the thickness of the continuation attempt zone.
• Trap Wick Threshold → defines how much rejection quality is needed before a failure becomes trap context.
• Use Volume Confirmation → adds relative volume to trap-quality scoring.
• Projection Bars → controls how far zones, rails, and right-side tags project.
• Label Font Size → controls chart label and tag text size.
• Panel Font Size → controls panel text size.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The visual hierarchy is built around the failed-continuation story.
The attempt zone shows where continuation was attempted.
The trap pocket shows where trapped participants may become part of the next narrative.
The opposite-pressure rail gives a clean reference for pressure confirmation.
The centered badge keeps the active trap context readable at first glance.
The AG Pro panel summarizes the current trap state without forcing the user to decode every element manually.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Let the script identify the active continuation bias.
2. Watch for an attempt beyond recent structure.
3. Check whether the attempt holds or fails back through the zone.
4. If trap context appears, watch the opposite-pressure rail.
5. Use the panel to confirm trap state, trapped side, and quality scores.
6. Interpret the output inside broader trend, liquidity, volatility, and support/resistance context.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A continuation attempt does not guarantee follow-through. It means price attempted to move beyond recent structure in the trend direction.
A trap active state does not guarantee reversal. It means the continuation attempt failed back through the attempt zone with enough quality to deserve attention.
Opposite pressure does not guarantee trend change. It means trapped participants may be adding pressure against the attempted continuation.
The strongest readings occur when trap state, pressure rail, and broader market context align.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
It is not financial advice.
It is not an auto-trading system.
It does not provide guaranteed entry or exit signals.
It is not a generic breakout indicator.
It is not a simple reversal marker.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
EMA bias can lag during fast reversals.
Failure windows may miss slow-developing traps.
Low-liquidity markets can produce misleading wick behavior.
High volatility can make attempt zones wider or less stable.
Timeframe differences can change how continuation attempts appear.
The script is designed for structured interpretation, not certainty.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Failed continuation traps often matter most when traders are leaning heavily in one direction and price fails to reward that pressure.
The same failed attempt can have different meaning in a strong trend, range, liquidity sweep, or volatility shock.
The script should be read together with broader structure, volume, liquidity, and trend context.
🧾 Use Case Examples
• If price attempts upside continuation and then closes back below the attempt level with a strong upper wick, the script may show long-trap context.
• If price attempts downside continuation and then rejects back above the attempt level, the script may show short-trap context.
• If price continues beyond the pressure rail after a trap, the script may show opposite-pressure confirmation.
🧱 System Philosophy
Failed Continuation Trap Map is part of the AGPro Series approach to decision-support tools:
clear structure, premium chart readability, honest interpretation, and no promise of certainty.
The goal is to help traders see when continuation logic breaks, without turning every failure into a forced reversal signal.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can know the future.
No failed continuation guarantees reversal.
No signal should be interpreted without broader market context.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Markets can move unpredictably.
This script is for educational and analytical purposes only.
It does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions.
📚 Educational Note
Use this script to study how continuation attempts fail and how trapped participants can affect the next phase of market behavior.
The value is not only in the trap label. The value is in learning when a continuation narrative is accepted, rejected, or converted into opposite pressure.
Indicateur
Round Number Rejection Planner [AGPro Series]# Round Number Rejection Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is the round number acting as rejection, magnet, or failed reference?
📌 Overview / What it does
Round Number Rejection Planner is a psychological price level decision-support script built to evaluate how price reacts around nearby round numbers.
The script maps adaptive round-number bands, detects wick-based rejection behavior, separates rejection from magnet conditions, scores the context from 0 to 100, and summarizes the current state inside a compact AG Pro panel.
It does not predict price direction, automate trades, or provide guaranteed signals. It is designed to organize round-number context, rejection quality, distance, failure risk, and action state into a clean visual workflow.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
Round numbers often attract attention because they are easy reference points for traders, algorithms, stops, targets, and liquidity.
This script was built for traders who want to evaluate whether price is respecting a psychological level, getting pulled toward it, or failing to reject it cleanly.
The design supports structured observation instead of treating every round-number touch as a signal.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools draw psychological levels or mark round numbers.
This script does NOT stop at drawing levels.
Instead, it evaluates the behavior around the level: wick rejection, close location, distance, reaction count, volatility fit, and failure risk.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Adaptive Round Level Detection
2. Psychological Band Mapping
3. Wick Rejection Evaluation
4. Magnet And Failure Risk Detection
5. 0-100 Rejection Score
6. Panel And Alert Output
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
The active round band marks the nearest psychological price zone.
Nearby round rails show the next upper and lower round references.
READY REJECTION labels appear when wick response, close location, and score quality align.
Magnet or failed-reference states appear when price interacts with the level without a clean rejection.
The panel summarizes Round Level, Rejection Score, Distance, Failure Risk, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• READY → A qualified round-number rejection has formed.
• MONITOR → Price is near the round number but rejection quality is not yet strong enough.
• WAIT → No active round-number context is close enough to evaluate.
• INVALIDATED → Price failed through the level instead of rejecting it.
• BLOCKED → The script cannot define a valid round-number context.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Bullish Round Number Rejection Ready triggers when price rejects upward from a round-number band with enough quality.
Bearish Round Number Rejection Ready triggers when price rejects downward from a round-number band with enough quality.
Round Number Magnet Warning triggers when price is close to the level but rejection quality is weak.
Round Number Rejection Invalidated triggers when price fails through the level instead of respecting it.
Alerts are attention markers, not trade instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The rejection score combines wick strength, close distance from the level, proximity, recent reaction count, relative volume, and volatility fit.
When several of these conditions align, the context becomes stronger.
When they do not align, the script remains in WAIT, MONITOR, INVALIDATED, or BLOCKED state.
📊 When to Use
• Psychological level analysis
• Intraday price action workflows
• Round-number rejection setups
• Stop and liquidity reaction observation
• Support and resistance context around visible price levels
⚠️ When NOT to Use
Avoid relying on this script in extremely illiquid markets, very noisy symbols, holiday sessions, or conditions where round numbers are not meaningful to participants.
It should not be used as a standalone decision tool without broader market context, risk planning, and independent confirmation.
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Round Level Mode controls whether level spacing is automatic or manual.
• Manual Round Step defines custom level spacing when manual mode is selected.
• Round Band ATR controls the width of the psychological level band.
• Max Active Distance controls how close price must be before evaluation begins.
• Minimum Ready Score controls how strong the rejection must be before READY appears.
• Failure Risk Threshold controls when weak rejection or magnet behavior blocks READY.
• Visual settings control bands, rails, labels, right-side tags, panel location, and font size.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed to make the active psychological level readable without flooding the chart.
The chart shows the active round band, nearby round rails, failure shelf, and relevant rejection labels.
The AG Pro panel provides compact decision context while preserving chart visibility.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Check the active round level in the panel.
2. Observe whether price is touching or rejecting the round band.
3. Read the rejection score and failure risk.
4. Check whether the action state is READY, MONITOR, WAIT, INVALIDATED, or BLOCKED.
5. Confirm the context with broader trend, liquidity, volatility, and risk structure.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A higher rejection score means the round-number reaction is cleaner according to the script logic.
A high failure risk means the level may be acting more like a magnet or failed reference.
READY means the rejection context deserves attention, not that price must reverse.
MONITOR means price is near the level but the reaction is not yet clean enough.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
It is not financial advice.
It is not an auto-trading system.
It does not provide guaranteed signals.
It does not replace risk management or independent analysis.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Round-number behavior changes across markets, symbols, timeframes, volatility regimes, and liquidity conditions.
The score is rule-based and depends on wick behavior, close location, distance, relative volume, and ATR normalization.
Different symbols may require different round-step or sensitivity settings.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Round-number rejection can be more meaningful when aligned with liquidity response, trend context, session timing, volume participation, and nearby structure.
Weak rejection near a level can become magnet behavior instead of a clean turn.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can guarantee future price behavior.
This tool provides structured visual context only.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions.
This script is for educational and analytical purposes only and does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes.
Indicateur
Range Breakdown Readiness [AGPro Series]Range Breakdown Readiness
🧠 Core Idea
Is the range breakdown valid, early, or likely to fail?
📌 Overview / What it does
Range Breakdown Readiness is a support-side breakdown planning tool built to evaluate whether price is actually accepting below a mature range or only probing below support and returning.
The script maps a prior range, tracks the support-side breakdown, draws a breakdown acceptance band, projects a target-room corridor, marks reclaim risk, and summarizes the setup through a 0-100 Breakdown Score.
It does not predict price direction, automate decisions, or turn every low into a tradeable support level. It is a rule-based chart-reading and planning framework.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
Many breakdown tools only mark the moment price moves below a level. That is usually not enough.
This script was built for traders who want to review breakdown quality before reacting. It focuses on acceptance, failure risk, target room, and the next planning action rather than printing generic bearish signals.
The mindset is simple: a breakdown should be reviewed as a structured decision context, not as a one-bar event.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on break markers, support/resistance lines, or broad breakout confirmation.
This script does NOT clone Consolidation Breakout Quality, Range Escape Planner, Compression Breakout Readiness, or a generic S/R zone map.
Instead, it stays narrow: it evaluates the support-side breakdown of a mature range and asks whether the break has enough acceptance to deserve review, or whether reclaim/failure risk is still too high.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script maps the prior range high and range support edge, then checks whether the structure is mature enough to evaluate.
2. Reference Mapping
It uses the support edge as the breakdown reference, then draws a range box, acceptance band, reclaim rail, and target-room corridor.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The score combines range age, close below support, candle close quality, volume support, retest rejection, and target room.
4. Visual Output
The chart receives clean planning zones, compact labels, guide lines, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel with state, score, acceptance, risk, and action.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the mapped range, the breakdown acceptance band, and the target-room corridor.
Labels = support watch, breakdown, breakdown ready, retest rejection, follow-through, reclaim risk, and failure risk states.
Colors = teal and indigo for constructive planning context, pink for active breakdown pressure, amber for caution and failure-risk review.
Panel = the planning summary: Range State, Breakdown Score, Acceptance, Failure Risk, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Support Watch → price is near the support side of a mature range.
• New Range Breakdown → price closed below the mapped support edge.
• Breakdown Ready → score and failure-risk context support a stronger breakdown review.
• Retest Rejection → price revisited the broken support area and rejected from the acceptance band.
• Failure Risk Review → acceptance is weak or reclaim pressure increased.
• Breakdown Reclaim → price moved back above the reclaim rail and the active review is invalidated.
• Target Corridor Reached → price reached the projected target-room area.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when the script detects support watch, a new breakdown, breakdown ready state, retest rejection, failure-risk review, follow-through, reclaim, or target-corridor contact.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The breakdown context becomes stronger when range maturity, close distance below support, bearish close quality, relative volume, retest rejection, and target room align.
The context weakens when the move stays too close to support, forms a large lower wick, lacks volume support, or reclaims back above the support rail.
📊 When to Use
• Mature ranges that begin to test the lower boundary.
• Breakdown review after a support-side close outside the range.
• Markets where target room below the range matters.
• Charts where a trader wants failure-risk context before reacting.
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely illiquid symbols.
• Very noisy micro timeframes with unreliable range structure.
• News spikes where ATR and volume become distorted.
• Markets that gap through the entire range before a readable review forms.
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Range Lookback → controls the range reference window.
• Minimum Range Age → controls how mature the range must be before readiness improves.
• Minimum Close Below Support ATR → controls the required close distance below support.
• Acceptance Band ATR → controls the width of the breakdown acceptance band.
• Reclaim Buffer ATR → controls the invalidation rail above support.
• Target Corridor Range Multiple → controls the projected target-room corridor.
• Label and Panel Font Size → controls publication readability.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed to stay chart-first. The range box, acceptance band, and target corridor provide the main visual structure.
The panel stays compact and decision-oriented, with one merged blue AGPro header row and five planner rows.
Labels are limited, offset away from candles, and controlled by cooldown and max-visible settings to preserve a premium chart view.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state.
2. Check whether the range is mature or only building.
3. Review the support-side acceptance band after a close below support.
4. Compare Breakdown Score with Failure Risk.
5. Watch the reclaim rail and target-room corridor as context references.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in terms of quality and failure risk.
A low score does not mean price cannot continue. It means the current breakdown context is not yet clean.
A high score does not mean certainty. It means the script sees stronger alignment between range maturity, acceptance, volume, candle quality, retest behavior, and target room.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine.
• Not financial advice.
• Not auto trading.
• Not guaranteed signals.
• Not a generic support/resistance scanner.
• Not an Order Block, Fair Value Gap, BOS/CHOCH, or broad SMC map.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Range quality can change by timeframe.
High volatility can make reclaim and target-room references move quickly.
Low liquidity can reduce the usefulness of volume support.
The script is rule-based and should be interpreted within broader market context.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Breakdowns are often most useful when the prior range is mature, the support edge is clear, and price has enough room below the range to develop.
Weak breakdowns often appear as a quick pierce below support followed by a reclaim back inside the range.
This script focuses on that difference.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price closes below range support with strong close quality, elevated relative volume, and a clean target corridor, the panel may move toward Breakdown Ready.
When price pierces below support but closes back near or above the edge, the script may show Failure Risk or Reclaim Review.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGPro planning tools are built to reduce chart ambiguity. The goal is not to add another signal, but to organize the decision context around structure, risk, acceptance, and next action.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can provide certainty.
No score should be interpreted as a guaranteed outcome.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own decisions.
This script does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes.
📚 Educational Note
Use the script as an educational planning layer to study breakdown quality, reclaim risk, and target-room context across different symbols and timeframes.
Indicateur
Breakout Follow-Through Planner [AGPro Series]Breakout Follow-Through Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Did the breakout receive enough follow-through to stay valid?
📌 Overview / What it does
Breakout Follow-Through Planner is a chart-first breakout planning tool designed to evaluate what happens after price clears a recent structure edge.
Instead of treating the breakout candle as the full story, the script maps the broken level, creates a follow-through corridor, tracks post-break travel, measures close progress, monitors retest-depth risk, and converts the full sequence into a 0-100 Follow-Through Score.
The script produces a breakout line, follow-through corridor, weak-continuation labels, failure rail, target-room guide, alerts, and a clean AGPro decision panel. It does not predict price, automate trades, or issue entry/exit commands.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who already understand that a breakout is only the first event.
The practical question comes after the break: does price travel away from the level, hold enough distance, and preserve clean room, or does it stall and begin to retest too deeply? This planner turns that post-break phase into a readable decision process.
The design supports a planning mindset: identify the breakout, review follow-through quality, respect the failure rail, measure target room, and decide whether the active context still deserves attention.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most breakout tools focus on the moment price crosses a level.
This script does NOT clone Breakout Volume Quality, Breakout Retest Readiness, Acceptance Breakout Planner, Volume Expansion Breakout Planner, or a generic support/resistance breakout scanner.
Instead, it focuses on post-break travel quality. The key question is not simply "did price break?" or "was volume high?" or "did the retest hold?" The key question is whether the breakout received enough follow-through after the break to remain structurally valid.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script builds recent upper and lower breakout references from a configurable prior structure window.
2. Reference Mapping
When price closes beyond a reference edge by an ATR-normalized buffer, the planner starts an active breakout follow-through plan.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The model evaluates break candle quality, volume support, follow-through travel, number of closes beyond the breakout close, retest-depth risk, target room, and failure rail behavior.
4. Visual Output
The chart shows the breakout line, active follow-through corridor, failure rail, target-room guide, compact labels, and an AGPro panel summarizing the current decision state.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Follow-Through Corridor = the active path from the breakout close toward the target-room guide. Its text is centered inside the corridor.
Breakout Line = the structure edge that was cleared and now anchors the active plan.
Failure Rail = the invalidation reference behind the breakout line. It is an analytical guide, not a stop order.
Target Room = the projected planning guide based on the prior structure height.
Labels = compact markers such as BFT UP, BFT DN, FT READY, WEAK FT, RETEST RISK, FAIL RAIL, ROOM HIT, and TRACK.
Colors = teal supports constructive bullish follow-through, pink supports bearish follow-through, amber marks caution, indigo marks target-room review, and red marks failure rail pressure.
Panel = the main decision interface showing Breakout Side, Follow-Through, Retest Risk, Target Room, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• BFT UP → a bullish breakout started a follow-through review.
• BFT DN → a bearish breakout started a follow-through review.
• FT WATCH → follow-through evidence is developing but not complete.
• FT READY → travel, closes, score quality, and retest-depth conditions are constructive.
• WEAK FT → the follow-through window aged without enough progress.
• RETEST RISK → price moved too deeply back toward or through the breakout line.
• FAIL RAIL → price closed through the failure rail after the breakout plan.
• ROOM HIT → price reached the target-room guide and context should be reviewed.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts can trigger when a bullish or bearish breakout plan starts, follow-through reaches the ready state, weak follow-through or retest risk appears, the failure rail is hit, or target-room review is reached.
These alerts are attention markers for chart review. They are not trade instructions, automated strategy rules, or guaranteed outcomes.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest follow-through context usually appears when the breakout candle is clean, price travels away from the breakout close, multiple closes hold beyond the breakout close, retest depth remains controlled, volume support is present, and target room is still readable.
When these conditions weaken, the planner can shift toward FT WATCH, WEAK FT, RETEST RISK, FAILED, or TARGET REVIEW.
📊 When to Use
• Breakout continuation review
• Range exits where post-break travel matters
• Trend continuation attempts after structure breaks
• Breakouts that need a clear failure rail and target-room reference
• Chart review workflows where the trader wants a decision state instead of another raw breakout marker
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Low-liquidity markets with unreliable candles or volume
• Extremely noisy ranges where every breakout immediately snaps back inside
• Abnormal news spikes where ATR and structure references may distort quickly
• Situations where the user needs full trade management, position sizing, or automation
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Structure Lookback → controls the recent high/low reference used for breakout detection.
• Break Buffer ATR → defines how far price must close beyond the reference edge.
• Minimum Break Quality → filters weaker breakout candles before the planner starts.
• Follow-Through Window → controls the early review period after the breakout.
• Required Travel ATR → defines the preferred post-break travel distance.
• Maximum Clean Retest Depth ATR → controls when retest depth becomes risk.
• Failure Rail ATR → sets the analytical invalidation rail behind the breakout line.
• Target Room Range Multiple → projects the target-room guide from prior structure height.
• Visual and Panel Settings → control corridor visibility, labels, panel location, theme, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is intentionally chart-first.
The follow-through corridor carries the main story, while the breakout line, failure rail, and target guide create a clean level-risk-room hierarchy. Labels are compact and controlled by cooldown and maximum-visible settings so the chart remains active without becoming crowded.
The AGPro panel uses a merged blue title row and a compact decision layout for fast review.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel to identify the current breakout side and follow-through state.
2. Check the breakout line and follow-through corridor.
3. Review whether price is traveling away, stalling, retesting too deeply, or reaching target room.
4. Use the failure rail as a structural review reference.
5. Treat the Action row as a planning prompt, not as an instruction.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
The Follow-Through Score should be read as context quality, not certainty.
A higher score means the breakout has cleaner post-break travel under the script's rules. A lower score means the breakout may be stalling, losing distance, retesting too deeply, or lacking enough supporting evidence.
The target-room guide does not forecast price. It gives a structured reference for whether the current path still has room to review.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
This script is not financial advice.
This script is not an auto-trading system.
This script does not provide guaranteed signals.
This script is not a generic support/resistance map.
This script is not a Breakout Volume Quality clone.
This script is not a Breakout Retest Readiness clone.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
The script is rule-based and depends on the selected lookback, ATR length, timeframe, and symbol behavior.
Different markets can produce different breakout behavior. Lower timeframes may show more noise. Higher timeframes may produce fewer but cleaner events.
Volatility changes can affect corridor size, failure rail distance, target-room projection, and event frequency. Outputs should be interpreted within broader market context.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Breakout follow-through is usually most useful when structure is readable, liquidity is sufficient, and the market has enough room to travel after the break.
Volume can support the score, but the script is not built around volume alone. The central decision layer is post-break price travel and structural validity.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price breaks above recent structure and immediately travels away with multiple closes beyond the breakout close, the planner can move from FT WATCH toward FT READY.
When price breaks but returns deeply through the breakout line before enough travel appears, the planner can mark RETEST RISK or FAIL RAIL.
When price reaches the projected target-room guide, the planner shifts to ROOM HIT so the context can be reviewed instead of blindly extended.
🧱 System Philosophy
The script is built around the AGPro decision-engine approach: structure first, quality score second, risk and target context always visible, and no promise-based signals.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can provide certainty.
No output should be treated as a guarantee.
The tool organizes breakout follow-through context so users can review price action with more structure.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own decisions.
This script does not provide financial advice.
📚 Educational Note
Use the planner to study how breakouts behave after the first break. The value is in comparing clean follow-through, weak continuation, deep retests, and failure-rail behavior across many examples.
Indicateur
Trap Failure Planner [AGPro Series]Trap Failure Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is the trap thesis itself failing and handing control back through the edge?
📌 Overview / What it does
Trap Failure Planner is a chart-first control-return planner for traders who study trap behavior, failed participation, false break recovery, and post-trap execution readiness.
Instead of only marking the first trap or false break, the script watches the second step: after a trap thesis appears, does that thesis keep control, or does price return through the trap edge with enough quality to matter? It produces a 0-100 Failure Score, trap thesis zones, control-return labels, risk-edge guides, target-guide references, alerts, and a compact AG Pro planning panel.
It does not predict future price, automate entries, or claim that a control return must continue. Its role is to organize one specific decision question with clean visual structure.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built to fill the gap between first-touch trap markers and practical trade review.
Many tools stop when price runs a level and closes back inside. That can be useful, but traders still need to know whether the trap thesis survives after the first reaction. Trap Failure Planner focuses on that later decision point: is the trap still in control, or did the other side reclaim the edge?
The design supports a planner mindset. It helps traders evaluate state, score, risk edge, target context, and next action without turning the chart into a crowded signal board.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on the first false break, sweep, trap label, or reclaim back inside a range.
This script does NOT try to become another false-break trap detector, inducement scanner, liquidity grab detector, stop-hunt map, order block map, or generic support / resistance zone tool.
Instead, it focuses on the failure of the trap thesis itself. The workflow begins only after a trap thesis exists, then waits for control to return through the edge with persistence, follow-through, volume response, and acceptance quality.
That makes it a second-stage trap failure planner, not a first-stage trap detector.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script builds recent upper and lower trap-thesis rails from prior price action and normalizes behavior with ATR.
2. Reference Mapping
When price probes beyond a rail and closes back inside, the script maps a trap thesis zone between the rail and the probe extreme.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The planner tracks whether price returns through the trap edge within the failure window. The 0-100 model evaluates false break behavior, close recovery, follow-through, volume spike, control-return persistence, and level acceptance.
4. Visual Output
Qualified events print Trap Failed labels, retain the centered trap zone, and project risk-edge and target-guide references.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the active trap thesis area between the control edge and the probe extreme.
Labels = trap thesis states, sparse testing states, and confirmed Trap Failed events.
Colors = teal for bullish control-return context, pink for bearish control-return context, yellow for testing states, indigo for target guides, and red for risk edges.
Panel = the AG Pro summary showing Trap State, Failure Score, Control Shift, Risk Edge, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Upper Trap Thesis → price probed above the upper rail and closed back inside; the planner watches whether that trap thesis survives.
• Lower Trap Thesis → price probed below the lower rail and closed back inside; the planner watches whether that trap thesis survives.
• Return Test → price is challenging the trap edge, but the score or close-count requirement is not complete yet.
• Bull Control Return → an upper trap thesis failed and control returned back above the edge.
• Bear Control Return → a lower trap thesis failed and control returned back below the edge.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when upper or lower trap thesis states appear and when qualified bull or bear control-return events are confirmed.
High-score alerts require the event score to meet the selected alert threshold.
Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions, entry commands, or outcome guarantees.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The score becomes stronger when the trap thesis probe is clean, price returns through the trap edge, the return holds for the required close count, follow-through expands, volume rises relative to baseline, and the close location supports the control-return side.
When these components align, the trap failure context becomes cleaner. When they do not align, the script stays in watch, return-test, or reset mode.
📊 When to Use
• Markets with visible trap and failed-participation behavior
• False break structures where the first trap thesis may fail
• Breakout or breakdown attempts that get rejected, then reclaim control again
• Range-edge reviews where traders need a second-stage decision layer
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity symbols
• Very noisy micro timeframes with erratic wicks
• News spikes where structure changes too quickly
• Charts where recent rails are not meaningful planning references
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Planner Side → choose Auto, Bull Return Only, or Bear Return Only.
• Trap Thesis Lookback → controls the rolling reference rails used for trap thesis detection.
• Failure Window Bars → defines how long a trap thesis remains active before reset.
• Control Return Closes → defines how many closes beyond the edge are required for confirmation.
• Minimum Failure Score → controls how selective confirmed Trap Failed labels are.
• Control Return Buffer ATR → controls how much acceptance beyond the edge is required.
• Risk / Target Settings → control planning guide placement.
• Visual Settings → control zones, guides, labels, panel location, theme, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The panel is built for fast review: state first, score second, control shift third, then risk and action.
The trap thesis zone includes centered text so the chart remains readable without extra floating explanations.
Labels are compact, offset away from candles, and controlled by cooldown and maximum-visible settings.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel to identify whether a trap thesis is active or already failed.
2. Check the trap thesis zone and the edge being tested.
3. Review the Failure Score and Control Shift rows.
4. Use the Risk Edge and target guide as planning references.
5. Confirm the event inside broader market context.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in terms of control, not prediction.
A trap thesis label means price created a possible trap context. A Trap Failed label means that thesis lost control according to the script rules. A higher score means the failure was cleaner across the model components, not that the next move is guaranteed.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not auto trading
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a false-break trap detector clone
• Not an inducement scanner
• Not a liquidity grab detector
• Not a support / resistance zone scanner
• Not an order block or fair value gap map
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Trap behavior depends on timeframe, liquidity, spread, volatility, and market context.
The script uses a deterministic ruleset. It cannot know news context, hidden order flow, participant intent, or whether a control return will continue.
More aggressive settings may show more events but also more noise. More conservative settings may improve selectivity while reducing frequency.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Trap thesis failure often becomes more meaningful when it aligns with broader structure, volatility expansion, session context, or liquidity behavior.
The script is designed to organize that review, not replace it.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price probes above a recent upper rail, closes back inside, and later returns above that edge with persistence and follow-through, the planner can mark Bull Control Return if the score is strong enough.
When price probes below a recent lower rail, closes back inside, and later returns below that edge with acceptance, the planner can mark Bear Control Return.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGPro decision tools are built to reduce chart ambiguity by turning raw price events into structured review states.
Trap Failure Planner follows that philosophy by separating the first trap thesis from the later question of whether that thesis actually survives.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can remove uncertainty.
No script can guarantee direction, continuation, reversal, or profit.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own decisions, risk management, position sizing, and interpretation.
This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice.
📚 Educational Note
Use this script to study what happens after a trap thesis forms. The key question is not only whether price created a trap, but whether that trap can continue to defend control.
Indicateur
Failed Pullback Reversal Planner [AGPro Series]Failed Pullback Reversal Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Did the pullback fail to recover, and is it now creating a reversal-warning context?
📌 Overview / What it does
Failed Pullback Reversal Planner is a chart-first reversal risk planner built for one specific situation: a pullback inside an existing trend stops behaving like a healthy retracement and begins losing control.
The script maps a failed pullback pocket, control-loss rail, invalidation reference, target-room guide, compact state labels, alerts, and a clean AG Pro panel. It converts pullback depth, failed recovery, close behavior, volume response, and follow-through into a 0-100 Failure Score.
It does not predict future price movement, automate entries, or issue guaranteed buy/sell signals. Its role is to organize failed-pullback context into a clearer decision framework.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built because many pullback tools only focus on continuation quality. They often ask whether the pullback is healthy enough to resume the original trend.
Failed Pullback Reversal Planner focuses on the opposite decision layer. It asks whether the pullback failed to recover, lost the control reference, and now deserves reversal-risk review.
The design supports traders who want cleaner structure, risk location, target-room context, and next-action guidance without turning every candle into a signal.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on pullback continuation, moving-average bounces, or generic reversal markers.
This script does NOT clone Pullback Acceptance Planner, Low Volume Pullback Zones, Trend Continuation Quality, or a generic reversal signal indicator.
Instead, it treats failed pullbacks as a planning problem. Price must first enter a pullback context, then fail recovery around a control rail, then show enough close quality, volume response, and follow-through to raise reversal-risk state.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script identifies former bullish or bearish trend context using fast, base, and slow EMA alignment.
2. Reference Mapping
It builds a failed pullback pocket, control-loss rail, invalidation reference, and target-room guide using ATR-normalized logic.
3. Reaction Evaluation
It scores pullback depth, failed recovery, close against the former trend, volume response, and nearby follow-through.
4. Visual Output
It displays concept-native zones, centered zone labels, compact event labels, guide rails, alerts, and a premium AG Pro planning panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the failed pullback pocket and reversal-risk zone.
Labels = pullback test, control-loss, reversal-risk, or reset markers.
Colors = teal shows bullish reversal-risk context, pink shows bearish reversal-risk context, amber shows watch context, red shows control-loss or risk context, and indigo shows reset/recovery context.
Panel = a compact decision dashboard showing Pullback State, Failure Score, Reversal Risk, Invalidation, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• PB TEST → a recent pullback is being monitored for failed-recovery behavior.
• CTRL LOST → price has lost the control reference but has not fully qualified the warning state.
• REV RISK → failed pullback context has enough score to deserve reversal-risk review.
• RESET → optional marker showing that price reclaimed the invalidation reference and the failed-pullback plan should be reset.
• NO SETUP → no active failed-pullback context is present.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when the planner detects a monitored failed-pullback setup, a reversal-risk warning, invalidation/reset behavior, or meaningful follow-through after control loss.
Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest failed-pullback context appears when pullback depth is meaningful, price loses the control rail, the candle closes against the former trend, volume supports the shift, and follow-through begins beyond nearby structure.
When these components align, the Failure Score rises and the panel moves from watch context toward reversal-risk review.
📊 When to Use
• Trend pullbacks that start losing recovery quality
• Potential reversal transitions after a failed retracement
• Markets where a prior trend is weakening around a control reference
• Situations where invalidation and target-room context matter
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low liquidity markets
• Extremely noisy sideways conditions
• News-driven volatility spikes
• Markets with no clean prior trend context
• Symbols where volume behavior is unreliable
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Sensitivity → controls how strict the failed-pullback model is.
• Former Trend Side → restricts evaluation to bullish-trend or bearish-trend failures when needed.
• Failure Window Bars → defines how long after a pullback touch control-loss behavior can qualify.
• Control-Loss Buffer ATR → adjusts the rail used to mark failed recovery.
• Invalidation Buffer ATR → controls the reset reference beyond the fast trend anchor.
• Label and Panel Settings → control panel location, theme, font size, label size, label spacing, and visible label count.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built around a clean AG Pro decision panel and chart-first planning visuals.
The first panel row uses the AG Pro merged blue header standard with only the script name. The remaining rows focus on the active decision: pullback state, failure score, reversal risk, invalidation, and action.
The chart uses a focused failed pullback pocket, a reversal-risk zone, guide rails, and compact labels. The goal is a premium planning view without crowded generic signals.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state.
2. Check whether a pullback test is active.
3. Watch whether price loses the control rail.
4. Review the Failure Score and reversal-risk label.
5. Compare the invalidation reference and target-room guide before interpreting the context.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in terms of failed recovery quality, not prediction.
A higher Failure Score means the current pullback has stronger failed-recovery characteristics across depth, control loss, close behavior, volume, and follow-through.
A control-loss state means the setup is weakening but may still need more confirmation.
A reset state means the failed-pullback idea has been reclaimed and should be reassessed.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not auto trading
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a generic pullback continuation indicator
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
• Timeframe differences can change how pullback depth and failure windows appear.
• High volatility can distort ATR-normalized rails.
• Low-volume instruments may reduce the reliability of the volume component.
• Sideways markets can create repeated failed-pullback noise.
• Outputs should be interpreted with broader market structure.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Failed pullbacks often matter when a market was expected to recover in the direction of the prior trend but instead loses the control reference.
The script does not assume that every failed recovery becomes a full reversal. It simply marks when the context is strong enough to deserve review.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When a bullish trend pulls back toward the fast/base EMA area, fails to recover, and closes below the control rail with stronger participation, the planner may raise bearish reversal-risk context.
When a bearish trend pulls back upward, fails to reject lower, and closes above the control rail with follow-through, the planner may raise bullish reversal-risk context.
🧱 System Philosophy
The script is built around decision quality. It does not try to add another signal layer. It asks whether a specific market behavior is valid, how strong it is, where it is invalidated, and what should be reviewed next.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No guarantees.
No certainty.
The script organizes observable market behavior into a structured analytical view.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions.
This script does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes.
📚 Educational Note
Use the planner as an educational framework for studying failed pullbacks, recovery quality, control loss, and reversal-risk context.
Indicateur
Expansion Failure Planner [AGPro Series]Expansion Failure Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Did volatility expansion create real travel, or did it fail back inside the prior structure?
📌 Overview / What it does
Expansion Failure Planner is a public-free TradingView indicator built to evaluate failed volatility expansion attempts. It detects when price expands beyond a recent range edge, then tracks whether the move produces meaningful travel or quickly loses the edge.
The script produces a failed expansion corridor, expansion-edge guide, risk shelf, return-to-range target guide, compact state labels, alerts, and a clean AG Pro planning panel. It does not predict future price direction or automate trade decisions.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who do not only want to see that volatility expanded. They want to know whether the expansion still has quality, whether failure risk is rising, and what context should be reviewed next.
The design supports a decision-first workflow: identify the expansion attempt, measure failure risk, review target room, and decide whether the context deserves attention.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most volatility tools focus on expansion, squeeze release, or breakout continuation.
This script does NOT act as a generic breakout signal, generic S/R zone, or continuation-only volatility map.
Instead, it focuses on one narrow question: did the expansion fail before producing real travel?
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script defines a prior range and watches for a volatility expansion attempt beyond that range edge.
2. Reference Mapping
It stores the expansion edge, expansion extreme, prior range midpoint, and return-to-range target area.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The planner scores failed travel using ATR expansion, close-back-inside behavior, missing follow-through, volume response, and range re-entry quality.
4. Visual Output
It draws the failed expansion corridor, expansion edge, risk shelf, return target, compact labels, and a premium AG Pro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the failed expansion corridor between the original edge and the expansion extreme.
Labels = expansion attempts, failure-ready states, watch states, hold states, and reset context.
Colors = teal for upside expansion attempts, pink for downside expansion attempts, yellow for watch context, and indigo for edge/hold review.
Panel = the preferred viewing timeframe, current expansion state, 0-100 failure risk, reclaim status, target room, and next action.
🚦 Signals & States
• UP EXP / DN EXP → a volatility expansion attempt has been detected.
• UP FAIL / DN FAIL → the expansion failed back inside the prior structure with enough score.
• WATCH → failure risk is developing but confirmation is incomplete.
• HOLD → expansion is still holding beyond the edge.
• RESET / NO FAIL → the active failure window expired or real travel invalidated the failure context.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when expansion failure reaches ready status, when watch context develops, when expansion holds beyond the edge, or when the failure window resets.
Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest context appears when ATR expansion, edge loss, missing follow-through, range re-entry, and participation align. When these components agree, the failure risk score increases.
📊 When to Use
• After volatility expansion attempts
• Around range-edge probes
• During breakout failure review
• When a move expands but does not travel
• When price quickly returns inside prior structure
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity symbols
• Very noisy micro ranges
• News-driven candles with abnormal gaps
• Markets where volume data is unreliable
• Charts where the prior range is not structurally meaningful
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Sensitivity → changes how strict the failure model is.
• Prior Range Lookback → defines the structure used for expansion reference.
• Expansion Bar ATR → controls how large a candle must be to qualify.
• Required Real Travel ATR → defines how much progress the expansion should produce.
• Confirmation Mode → controls close/volume/strict confirmation.
• Visual Settings → control corridor, guides, labels, projection, and label size.
• Panel Settings → control panel visibility, location, theme, font size, and best-viewed timeframe guidance.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The panel is designed as a compact planning cockpit. The first row uses the AGPro merged blue header standard, while the remaining rows show best-viewed timeframe guidance, state, score, reclaim status, target room, and action.
The visual hierarchy keeps the chart readable: one active corridor, clear guide lines, and controlled labels.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state.
2. Check whether price is above or below the expansion edge.
3. Review the failed expansion corridor.
4. Compare failure risk with target room.
5. Use alerts as attention markers, not decisions.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in terms of failed travel, not prediction. A high score means the script detected stronger failure characteristics. A low score means expansion may still be holding, or failure evidence is not strong enough.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not auto trading
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a generic breakout indicator
• Not a generic support/resistance zone map
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
• Timeframe differences can change expansion and failure structure.
• Volatility spikes can distort ATR-based scoring.
• Volume quality varies by market.
• Fast markets can move beyond the corridor before confirmation.
• Outputs should be interpreted within broader market context.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Expansion failure often matters when volatility appears strong but cannot create distance. This script focuses on that transition point between momentum attempt and failed travel.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price expands above a range, stalls quickly, closes back inside the edge, and fails to build distance, the planner can mark an upside expansion failure.
When price expands below a range, loses downside follow-through, and re-enters the structure, the planner can mark a downside expansion failure.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGPro tools are built to reduce chart ambiguity by turning raw market events into structured decision context.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can provide certainty. This script provides rule-based context only.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own decisions. This script does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes.
📚 Educational Note
Use the script as a structured learning and review tool for expansion failure behavior, failed travel, and volatility response.
Indicateur
Liquidity Reclaim Planner [AGPro Series]Liquidity Reclaim Planner
🧠 Core Idea
After a liquidity event, is the reclaim strong enough to matter, or is the move still fragile?
📌 Overview / What it does
Liquidity Reclaim Planner is a chart-first liquidity planning tool designed to evaluate what happens after price sweeps a recent swing liquidity reference.
Instead of treating every liquidity sweep as a finished signal, the script starts a structured reclaim workflow. It maps the liquidity event, the reclaim pocket, the failure line, the target-room corridor, a 0-100 reclaim score, failure risk, and a clear next-action state.
The script does not predict price direction, automate execution, or claim that a reclaim will continue. It organizes post-event liquidity context so traders can review whether the reclaim has enough quality, timing, participation, and room to deserve attention.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who want more than another sweep marker.
Many liquidity tools identify where a stop run, wick raid, or sweep happened. That is useful, but the harder question comes after the event: did price reclaim the level cleanly, is the failure point clear, and is there enough structure room for the idea to remain practical?
Liquidity Reclaim Planner supports a decision-engine mindset. It helps users move from raw event detection toward structured review: event, reclaim, failure risk, target room, and next action.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on detecting liquidity sweeps, equal highs, equal lows, or stop-hunt style wick events.
This script does NOT try to become a broad liquidity sweep scanner, an EQH/EQL engine, an order block map, a structural breakout reclaim planner, or a generic support/resistance zone tool.
Instead, it focuses on the post-event reclaim decision. It asks whether the sweep was reclaimed with enough depth balance, close strength, timing, volume response, and structural room to become a useful planning context.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The engine tracks confirmed swing highs and swing lows as active buy-side and sell-side liquidity references.
2. Reference Mapping
When price moves through a fresh liquidity reference by an ATR-normalized amount, the script registers a liquidity event and starts a reclaim plan.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The reclaim score evaluates sweep depth, reclaim close strength, time to reclaim, relative volume response, and room to the next structure reference.
4. Visual Output
The script draws the reclaim pocket, failure line, target-room corridor, event labels, sparse context labels, and the AG Pro decision panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the reclaim pocket between the swept liquidity level and the event extreme, plus an optional target-room corridor toward the next structural reference.
Labels = liquidity event, reclaim ready, room thin, failure line, and sparse context states.
Colors = bullish reclaim planning uses AGPro teal, bearish reclaim planning uses AGPro pink, neutral review uses gold, and risk/failure context uses red.
Panel = the panel shows Liquidity Event, Reclaim Score, Failure Risk, Room, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Sell-side Event → price swept a recent swing low and a bullish reclaim plan is being evaluated.
• Buy-side Event → price swept a recent swing high and a bearish reclaim plan is being evaluated.
• Reclaim Watch → price has not yet reclaimed strongly enough, but context is active.
• Planner Ready → reclaim score and target room are strong enough for structured review.
• Risk Review → reclaim exists, but the quality profile is not yet clean.
• Room Thin → reclaim exists, but the next structural room is limited.
• Failure Hit → price crossed the active failure line and the reclaim plan needs reassessment.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when a sell-side or buy-side liquidity event appears, when a reclaim becomes ready, when the planner reaches Planner Ready state, when target room becomes thin, or when the failure line is crossed.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions, entry commands, or automated strategy signals.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest context usually appears when sweep depth is balanced, reclaim happens quickly, the reclaim close is decisive, relative volume supports the reaction, and the target-room corridor is not compressed.
When these elements align, the reclaim score improves and the panel action becomes more useful for structured review.
📊 When to Use
• Liquidity-driven markets where swing highs and swing lows are actively swept.
• Intraday or swing charts where reclaim behavior after stop runs matters.
• 4H charts when the trader wants a balanced view between visible liquidity events and readable planning zones.
• Post-sweep review workflows.
• Situations where the trader needs a clear failure line and room assessment.
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity symbols where swing references are unreliable.
• Highly chaotic news candles where reclaim behavior is distorted by abnormal volatility.
• Very compressed chop where every small swing becomes noise.
• Markets where volume data is missing or not meaningful, unless volume weighting is interpreted carefully.
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Liquidity Pivot Strength → controls how swing liquidity references are confirmed.
• Max Liquidity Level Age → controls how long a swing reference remains eligible.
• Sensitivity → adjusts how selective liquidity event and reclaim thresholds are.
• Timely Reclaim Window → defines how many bars after the event can still count as timely reclaim.
• Planner Ready Score → controls the 0-100 score threshold for the main ready state.
• Minimum Target Room ATR → controls how much structure room is required before room is considered acceptable.
• Visual settings → control reclaim pockets, failure lines, target-room corridors, labels, panel theme, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built around a clean AG Pro panel and compact chart visuals.
The first panel row is a merged blue AGPro header. The remaining rows show the active liquidity event, reclaim score, failure risk, target room, and next action.
The chart uses a limited number of zones and labels so the active plan is visible without turning the chart into a crowded liquidity map.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel to identify whether a liquidity event is active.
2. Check the reclaim pocket to understand the swept level and event extreme.
3. Review the reclaim score and failure risk.
4. Check the target-room corridor before assigning importance to the reclaim.
5. Use the Action row to decide whether the context deserves review, waiting, or rejection.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in terms of quality, not certainty.
A reclaim with a high score, clean timing, strong close, and enough room is more useful than a late reclaim into nearby structure.
A low score does not mean price cannot move. It means the script's reclaim-planning conditions are not well aligned.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine.
• Not financial advice.
• Not auto trading.
• Not guaranteed signals.
• Not a complete liquidity or smart-money framework.
• Not an order block, FVG, or generic support/resistance map.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Swing references are confirmed after the selected pivot strength, so the script uses confirmed structure rather than instantly known future pivots.
Different timeframes, symbols, volatility regimes, and liquidity conditions can change how reclaim behavior appears.
Relative volume can add context, but volume response does not guarantee continuation or reversal.
Target-room corridors are structural planning references, not forecasts.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Liquidity events often matter most when they occur around visible swing references that many traders can identify.
The reclaim phase is where the decision quality changes. A fast reclaim can show rejection, while a slow or weak reclaim can indicate fragile context.
The failure line exists so the user can see where the active reclaim idea becomes structurally weaker according to the script's own rules.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price sweeps a recent swing low, quickly closes back above the level, and the target-room corridor is open, the planner may shift from Reclaim Watch to Planner Ready.
When price reclaims late or reclaims directly into nearby structure, the panel may show Risk Review or Room Thin.
When price crosses the active failure line after reclaim, the script marks Failure Hit so the context can be reassessed.
🧱 System Philosophy
Liquidity Reclaim Planner follows the AGPro Series approach: clear structure, rule-based scoring, readable visuals, and decision support without outcome promises.
The script is designed to help traders review the quality of a setup context, not to replace judgment or risk planning.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can provide certainty.
No reclaim score guarantees continuation, reversal, or profit.
The output should be interpreted as structured analytical context.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own decisions, position sizing, risk controls, and market interpretation.
This script does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes.
📚 Educational Note
Use this tool to study how liquidity events evolve after the sweep: whether price reclaims, where the failure line sits, how much room remains, and whether the context is strong enough to deserve further review.
Indicateur
Acceptance Breakout Planner [AGPro Series]Acceptance Breakout Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Did price truly accept beyond the breakout level, or did it only tag the level and fail to hold?
📌 Overview / What it does
Acceptance Breakout Planner is a chart-first breakout decision tool designed to evaluate what happens after price moves beyond a key rolling reference edge.
Instead of treating every breakout as meaningful, the script measures close persistence, time beyond the level, retest-hold behavior, range distance, candle quality, volume support, and failure shelf risk. It converts that evidence into a 0-100 Acceptance Score and a clear next-action state.
The script produces an acceptance band, a failure shelf, a target-room guide, controlled chart labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro planning panel. It does not predict price movement, automate execution, or claim that acceptance will continue.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built to fill the gap between a simple breakout marker and a full trade-management system.
Many traders can see when price crosses a level. The harder question is whether price is spending enough time beyond that level to deserve attention, or whether the break is only a low-commitment tag.
The design supports a planner mindset: observe the break, measure acceptance, watch the failure shelf, and review the next state with structure instead of reacting to a single candle.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most breakout tools focus on the moment price crosses a level.
This script does NOT function as a generic breakout signal, volume-spike detector, consolidation breakout box, Donchian channel tool, or broad break-retest scanner.
Instead, it focuses on post-break acceptance quality. The key question is not simply "did price break?" The key question is "did price remain accepted beyond the broken reference long enough to reduce tag-only risk?"
This keeps the script separate from Breakout Volume Quality, Consolidation Breakout Quality, Break-Retest Quality, Price Acceptance Profile, and reference-specific breakout tools in the AGPro catalog.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script maps rolling upper and lower reference edges from prior bars. These references are used only as breakout acceptance anchors.
2. Reference Mapping
When price closes beyond a reference edge by an ATR-adjusted buffer, the planner starts an active acceptance sequence.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The active sequence is scored through close persistence, time beyond the level, acceptance-band retests, candle quality, relative volume support, and distance from the failure shelf.
4. Visual Output
The chart shows an acceptance band, a failure shelf, a target-room guide, compact state labels, and a panel that summarizes acceptance score, time beyond, break side, failure risk, and action.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Acceptance Band = the zone around the broken level where price should hold if acceptance is developing.
Failure Shelf = the invalidation context behind the broken level. A close through this shelf means the breakout acceptance sequence needs review.
Target Room = a projected planning guide based on the prior reference range. It is not a forecast or promised target.
Labels = compact event markers such as BULL BRK, BEAR BRK, WATCH, HOLD, ACCEPT, TAG, RISK, and REJECT.
Colors = teal supports constructive acceptance, pink marks rejection or failure pressure, yellow marks caution, and indigo marks active watch states.
Panel = a compact decision view showing Acceptance Score, Time Beyond, Break Side, Failure Risk, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• BULL BRK → price closed beyond the upper reference and started an acceptance review.
• BEAR BRK → price closed beyond the lower reference and started an acceptance review.
• WATCH → acceptance evidence is improving but is not mature yet.
• HOLD → price revisited the acceptance band and held beyond the broken reference.
• ACCEPT → close persistence, score quality, and time beyond the level reached the accepted state.
• TAG → the sequence is active, but close persistence is still weak after the review window.
• RISK → acceptance is not mature and the failure shelf is becoming more relevant.
• REJECT → price closed through the failure shelf after the breakout sequence.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when a new acceptance break starts, when accepted state appears, when a retest hold is detected, when failure risk rises, or when price rejects through the failure shelf.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions, automation commands, or certainty statements.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest acceptance context appears when several conditions align:
• price closes beyond the broken reference more than once
• the acceptance band holds during a retest
• candle structure remains directional
• failure shelf distance remains healthy
• volume support is present without being the only reason for the score
When these elements align, the Acceptance Score rises and the state becomes easier to interpret.
📊 When to Use
• Breakout review after price crosses a visible range edge
• Markets where one-bar breakout tags are common
• Trend continuation attempts that need acceptance confirmation
• Range expansion moves where the trader wants to separate holding behavior from weak level pokes
• Chart review workflows that need a clear post-break next-action state
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity markets with unreliable candles
• Very noisy symbols where reference edges are constantly pierced
• News-driven volatility where ATR buffers may become unstable
• Situations where the user expects automatic trade entries
• Markets where volume data is missing and volume support is treated as less useful
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Break Side → controls whether the planner evaluates bullish breaks, bearish breaks, or both.
• Reference Lookback → defines the prior-bar range used to map breakout reference edges.
• Close Beyond Level ATR → controls how far beyond the level price must close before a sequence starts.
• Acceptance Band ATR → controls the retest-hold zone around the broken level.
• Failure Shelf ATR → controls the invalidation context behind the broken level.
• Minimum Beyond Closes → controls how much close persistence is required before acceptance can mature.
• ACCEPTED Threshold → sets the minimum 0-100 score for accepted state.
• Label / Panel Controls → adjust visual density, placement, theme, and font size.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed to stay chart-first. The acceptance band and failure shelf show the current structure, while labels mark only meaningful state changes.
The panel uses the AGPro standard: a single blue merged header row, compact rows, clear state colors, adjustable location, adjustable theme, and normal font size by default.
The visual hierarchy is intentionally restrained so the chart looks active without becoming crowded.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel to see the current Acceptance Score and action state.
2. Check whether price is holding beyond the broken reference or drifting back into the band.
3. Watch the failure shelf to understand whether the breakout is losing acceptance.
4. Review labels only as context markers, not as standalone decisions.
5. Confirm the broader market context before acting on any chart interpretation.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think of the script as a post-break acceptance reviewer.
A higher Acceptance Score means the breakout has stronger evidence of persistence according to the script model. A lower score means the move may still be early, weak, or vulnerable to failure.
The most useful reading is the relationship between time beyond the level, retest behavior, and failure shelf distance.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not an auto-trading system
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a generic support/resistance map
• Not a consolidation breakout box tool
• Not a pure volume breakout detector
• Not a full break-retest scanner
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Breakout acceptance is sensitive to timeframe, volatility, liquidity, and symbol behavior.
The reference edges are rolling and can change as older bars leave the lookback window.
ATR-based buffers can expand or contract during volatile market conditions.
Relative volume may be less useful on symbols with limited or inconsistent volume data.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Acceptance after a breakout is often more useful than the initial break itself.
A level tag shows that price reached a reference. Acceptance shows whether price can keep spending time beyond that reference.
This distinction is the core purpose of the planner.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price closes above a reference edge and then holds the acceptance band on a later retest, the script may shift from watch context toward stronger acceptance.
When price breaks a reference but quickly returns through the failure shelf, the script marks rejection context instead of treating the break as mature.
When price remains beyond the level but does not build enough persistence, the script can show TAG ONLY or FAILURE RISK.
🧱 System Philosophy
Acceptance Breakout Planner follows the AGPro decision-engine approach:
It does not ask users to react to a raw signal.
It organizes the chart into quality, state, risk, target-room context, and next-action review.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can remove uncertainty from markets.
No state, score, label, band, shelf, or alert guarantees future price behavior.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
This script is for educational and analytical use only.
It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, trade instructions, or guaranteed outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions, risk management, and market evaluation.
📚 Educational Note
Use the script to study the difference between a breakout tag and breakout acceptance.
The strongest value comes from comparing the planner state with broader structure, volatility, liquidity, and personal execution rules.
Indicateur
Initial Balance Break Planner [AGPro Series]Initial Balance Break Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is the Initial Balance break being accepted, or is it becoming vulnerable to failure back inside the balance?
📌 Overview / What it does
Initial Balance Break Planner is an intraday session planning tool built around the first major balance of the trading session. It maps a configurable Initial Balance window, tracks the first break beyond that balance, and evaluates whether that break has enough quality to deserve structured review. The default showcase workflow is designed for intraday charts up to 60 minutes.
The script produces a locked Initial Balance box, break review labels, acceptance labels, failure-risk labels, failed-IB markers, target rails, and an invalidation reference. The panel summarizes the active state through IB State, Break Side, Acceptance Score, Failure Risk, and Action.
It does not predict future price movement, automate trades, or tell the user what to buy or sell. It is a rule-based decision-support overlay for reading Initial Balance behavior with more structure.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built to solve a common intraday problem: many traders can see that price broke the first balance, but they still need a cleaner way to judge whether that break is accepted, stretched, weak, or vulnerable.
The tool is designed for traders who use session structure, Initial Balance concepts, intraday breakouts, and structured risk review. Its purpose is not to create another simple breakout signal. Its purpose is to turn the Initial Balance break into a practical planning framework.
The design philosophy is simple: map the balance, evaluate the break, show the risk, project the planning rails, and keep the next action readable.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most opening-range tools focus on basic breakout direction, raw high/low levels, or target projections.
This script does NOT clone ORB Quality or Opening Range Failure Zones. ORB Quality is focused on opening range breakout quality and drive continuation. Opening Range Failure Zones is focused on failed opening range probes and reclaim zones.
Instead, Initial Balance Break Planner focuses on the post-IB decision layer: is the first Initial Balance break accepted, does the retest response support the break, where is the invalidation reference, where are the target rails, and what should the trader review next?
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script builds the Initial Balance from a configurable session window. The default uses the first 60 minutes of the New York regular session.
2. Reference Mapping
Once the IB window ends, the script locks the IB high, IB low, and midpoint. The box remains centered with an internal state label so the chart stays visually clear.
3. Reaction Evaluation
After the first break, the planner scores the setup using:
• IB width
• Break close quality
• Retest response
• Relative volume support
• Volatility fit
4. Visual Output
The chart displays break labels, acceptance labels, risk-review labels, failed-IB markers, target rails, and an invalidation rail. The panel converts the model into a compact next-action state.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
The Initial Balance box represents the first session balance selected by the user.
Break labels show when price closes beyond the IB edge with enough buffer to start review.
Acceptance labels appear when the break has enough score, enough confirmation time, and controlled failure risk.
Failure-risk labels warn that the break is weakening or returning back inside the balance.
Target rails show measured planning references from the broken IB edge.
The invalidation rail marks the area where the break begins losing acceptance quality.
Panel colors summarize the current state:
• Teal → stronger acceptance or constructive long-side context
• Pink → bearish break side or failed context
• Amber → watch, risk review, or unresolved state
• Indigo / blue → active planning context
🚦 Signals & States
• IB READY → the Initial Balance has locked and the planner is ready to track the first break
• BREAK UP REVIEW → price closed beyond the upper IB edge and long-side review has started
• BREAK DOWN REVIEW → price closed beyond the lower IB edge and short-side review has started
• RETEST HOLD → price retested the broken IB edge without clearly losing it
• ACCEPTED → the break met the acceptance threshold with controlled failure risk
• RISK REVIEW → the break is not yet accepted and failure vulnerability is rising
• FAILED IB → price failed back inside the Initial Balance with elevated weakness context
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when the script detects:
• A bullish IB break review
• A bearish IB break review
• Bullish IB acceptance
• Bearish IB acceptance
• Failure-risk review
• Failed return back inside the IB
Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest context appears when the break close is clean, the IB width is balanced, volume is supportive, volatility is not overheated, and the retest response holds the broken edge.
When these elements align, the Acceptance Score improves and the panel can move from Observe Retest into Review Long or Review Short.
📊 When to Use
• Intraday markets with clear session structure
• 1-minute to 60-minute charts
• Index, futures, FX, and liquid crypto sessions
• Initial Balance breakout review
• Session expansion planning
• Post-break retest evaluation
• Risk and target planning after the first session balance breaks
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low-liquidity symbols
• Extremely noisy micro timeframes
• Markets with poor session definition
• Events with abnormal volatility spikes
• Symbols where volume data is unreliable and should not be weighted heavily
• Higher timeframes where the selected IB session has little practical meaning
• 4H, daily, weekly, or monthly charts where a one-session Initial Balance cannot be mapped cleanly
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Initial Balance Window → defines the balance-building period
• Tracking Session → defines when break review can update
• Sensitivity → adjusts how selective the planner is
• Acceptance Lookback → controls the review window after the first break
• Minimum Acceptance Score → sets the threshold for accepted-break states
• Confirmation Mode → chooses confirmed-bar behavior or live updating
• Break Buffer ATR → controls how far price must close beyond the IB edge
• Retest Response Buffer ATR → controls retest tolerance around the broken edge
• Failure Buffer ATR → controls how quickly returning inside the IB raises risk
• Target Rail Multiples → control measured target references
• Max Visible IB Boxes → controls how many recent balance boxes stay on the chart
• Max Visible Labels → controls how many recent event labels stay on the chart
• Show IB Ready Labels → optionally displays a readiness label when the Initial Balance locks
• Visual Settings → control labels, box count, rail projection, and spacing
• Panel Settings → control panel visibility, location, theme, and font size
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The script uses a chart-first design. The Initial Balance box is the main anchor, and the centered box label keeps the active state visible without requiring a large dashboard.
Event labels are deliberately compact and offset away from candles. Target rails and invalidation rails are projected only after a break, so the chart remains clean during the balance-building phase.
The AG Pro panel uses a single merged blue header row and five compact rows so the user can quickly scan state, side, score, risk, and action.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel after the Initial Balance locks.
2. Wait for price to break one IB edge.
3. Check whether the break receives a clean score or moves into risk review.
4. Watch the broken edge for retest behavior.
5. Use the target rails and invalidation rail as planning references.
6. Interpret the result within broader market context.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
The Acceptance Score is a quality score, not a prediction. Higher scores mean the break has better internal structure according to the script's rules.
Failure Risk is a warning layer. It rises when price loses acceptance quality, moves back inside the IB, shows weak close behavior, or lacks participation.
The Action row is the most practical summary. It helps the user decide whether the environment is still building, waiting, reviewing, accepted, vulnerable, or better left alone.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not auto trading
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a generic ORB breakout system
• Not Opening Range Failure Zones
• Not a broad support/resistance or order-block map
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Initial Balance behavior changes across symbols, sessions, and timeframes. A 60-minute IB on one market may behave differently from the same window on another market.
Relative volume can be less useful on symbols where reported volume is incomplete or inconsistent.
Fast news events, thin liquidity, and unusual volatility can reduce the usefulness of any session-break model.
The script evaluates rule-based context only. It cannot know future order flow or guarantee what price will do next.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Initial Balance analysis is most useful when the session has a meaningful opening phase and a clear expansion phase.
A clean break usually needs more than a line cross. The break should show location, acceptance, participation, and controlled risk.
A weak break can still travel further, and a strong break can still fail. The script is designed to help structure the review, not remove uncertainty.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price breaks above the IB high, receives a strong acceptance score, holds the broken edge on retest, and keeps failure risk low, the panel may move into Review Long.
When price breaks below the IB low but quickly returns back inside the balance with weak close quality, the panel may move into Failure Watch or Failed Back In.
When the IB is too wide, volatility is unstable, and the break lacks volume support, the planner can remain cautious even if price has crossed the edge.
🧱 System Philosophy
The AGPro Series approach is built around decision structure, not raw signal output.
Initial Balance Break Planner follows that philosophy by combining a visible session reference with a score, risk layer, target references, and a next-action panel.
The goal is to make the chart easier to interpret without making the chart crowded.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
This script does not provide certainty.
It does not guarantee that an accepted break will continue or that a vulnerable break will reverse.
All outputs should be interpreted as structured analytical context.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, execution, and risk management.
This script is not financial advice and does not provide guaranteed trading outcomes.
📚 Educational Note
Initial Balance analysis can help traders study how a session moves from balance into expansion, but it should always be combined with broader market structure, liquidity, volatility, and personal execution rules.
Indicateur
Volatility Stop Run Planner [AGPro Series]Volatility Stop Run Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is the current volatility spike a stop-run review context, or is it behaving more like real expansion?
📌 Overview / What it does
Volatility Stop Run Planner is a chart-first volatility risk and execution-readiness tool designed to evaluate sharp ATR expansion around recent range edges.
The script studies wick expansion, ATR load, close recovery, range-edge penetration, reclaim quality, and early follow-through. It then converts qualified events into a 0-100 planner score, a clear next-action state, reclaim guides, invalidation guides, target-room references, stop-run review zones, expansion review zones, and a clean AGPro planning panel.
It does not predict where price must go next. It does not automate entries or exits. It is built to organize volatile stop-run and expansion contexts so traders can evaluate the event with more structure.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who need a practical decision framework during fast volatility spikes.
Many charts look most confusing exactly when volatility expands: wicks stretch, stops may be triggered, range edges are breached, and the candle can either reclaim or continue. This planner fills that gap by asking whether the spike is showing stop-run characteristics, real expansion behavior, or a cooldown state that still needs confirmation.
The design supports a planning mindset: identify the event, evaluate quality, locate the reclaim level, define invalidation context, estimate target room, and decide what deserves attention next.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most stop-run tools focus on liquidity sweeps, stop-hunt zones, or level raids.
This script does NOT try to become another liquidity grab detector, stop-hunt map, order block map, or generic sweep marker.
Instead, it focuses on the volatility event itself. It evaluates whether a spike around a recent range edge is recovering, rejecting, expanding, or entering a cooldown window. The core output is not a buy or sell signal. It is a planner state that helps the user decide whether the current volatility context deserves review, patience, or no action.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script measures ATR load, candle range relative to ATR, wick dominance, body efficiency, and recent range-edge interaction.
2. Reference Mapping
It maps the recent high / low reference range, the reclaim level, the spike extreme, the invalidation guide, and the target-room reference.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The model scores stop-run risk, reclaim quality, volatility load, range-edge penetration, and expansion quality. These components are blended into a 0-100 planner score.
4. Visual Output
Qualified events are displayed through stop-run review zones, expansion review zones, reclaim lines, active risk / target guides, optional volatility cooldown boxes, premium labels, alerts, and a compact AGPro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = stop-run or expansion review areas created around qualified volatility spike events.
Labels = compact event markers showing the detected context, planner score, score tier, and next-action state.
Colors = bullish reclaim contexts use AGPro teal, bearish reclaim contexts use AGPro pink, and expansion / neutral review contexts use controlled accent tones.
Panel = the panel summarizes Spike State, Planner Score, Stop-Run Risk, Reclaim Quality, Risk / Target, Volatility Load, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Bull Stop-Run → downside spike below the recent range edge followed by reclaim-quality behavior.
• Bear Stop-Run → upside spike above the recent range edge followed by rejection-quality behavior.
• Expansion Up → volatility spike closes cleanly above the recent range edge with stronger body efficiency.
• Expansion Down → volatility spike closes cleanly below the recent range edge with stronger body efficiency.
• Spike Watch → volatility is elevated, but the candle has not yet produced enough reclaim or expansion evidence.
• Normal Load → no qualified volatility event is currently detected.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when the planner detects a qualified Bull Stop-Run Review, Bear Stop-Run Review, Expansion Up Review, Expansion Down Review, or Spike Watch context.
These alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions, entry signals, exit signals, or automated strategy commands.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest planner states appear when multiple conditions align:
ATR spike + wick expansion + range-edge penetration + reclaim quality + clean risk / target context.
When the spike reclaims the reference level with strong wick rejection, the stop-run review context becomes stronger. When the candle closes beyond the range edge with strong body efficiency, the expansion review context becomes stronger.
📊 When to Use
• Around sudden volatility spikes
• Near recent range highs or lows
• During breakout or breakdown attempts
• After large wick candles that need structured interpretation
• When deciding whether a fast move deserves review, patience, or no action
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity symbols
• Very noisy micro-timeframes
• News-driven candles with abnormal gaps
• Markets where ATR is distorted by isolated historical spikes
• Situations where the user expects a simple signal-only entry tool
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Sensitivity → controls how selective the spike and stop-run planner should be.
• Reference Lookback → defines the recent range edge used for spike evaluation.
• ATR Length → normalizes volatility, invalidation, target room, and label spacing.
• Minimum Planner Score → sets the score required before events are drawn.
• Confirmation Mode → controls how strict reclaim or expansion confirmation should be.
• Cooldown Bars → defines the post-spike visual review window.
• Visual settings → control zones, labels, guides, panel theme, panel location, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed to stay chart-first.
The panel provides the decision summary. The chart zones show where the volatility event happened. The reclaim line identifies the reference level. The risk / target guides frame the active review context without turning the script into a trade command system.
The visual hierarchy is intentionally compact, premium, and readable.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel to identify the current Spike State and Planner Score.
2. Check whether the chart is showing a stop-run review, expansion review, or spike watch context.
3. Compare the reclaim line with the candle close and wick behavior.
4. Review the invalidation and target-room guides.
5. Interpret the event within broader market structure and volatility conditions.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high stop-run risk score means the spike has stronger rejection and reclaim characteristics.
A high expansion score means the spike is behaving more like continuation through the range edge.
A cooldown window means the event needs follow-through review rather than immediate interpretation.
No single score should be read in isolation. The strongest use case is to combine the planner state with structure, liquidity, trend, and timeframe context.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not an auto trading system
• Not a guaranteed signal tool
• Not a liquidity grab detector
• Not a stop-hunt zone map
• Not an order block or FVG map
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Volatility behavior changes across symbols, sessions, and timeframes.
ATR can expand sharply during news, low-liquidity gaps, or abnormal market conditions.
Some stop-run-looking candles can still continue in the same direction. Some expansion-looking candles can fail quickly. The script provides structured context, not certainty.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Stop-run behavior often appears when price briefly trades through visible reference areas and then reclaims them.
Expansion behavior often appears when price accepts beyond the reference with stronger body efficiency and less rejection.
The planner is designed to help users separate these contexts with a consistent rule-based framework.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price spikes below a recent low, leaves a large lower wick, and closes back above the reference, the script may classify the event as a Bull Stop-Run Review.
When price expands above a recent high with a strong body close and limited upper rejection, the script may classify the event as Expansion Up.
When volatility spikes but reclaim or expansion evidence is incomplete, the script may show Spike Watch or keep the event in cooldown.
🧱 System Philosophy
Volatility Stop Run Planner follows the AGPro Series decision-engine approach:
Context first.
Risk before reaction.
Reclaim before assumption.
Expansion quality before excitement.
Attention markers instead of promises.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can remove uncertainty.
No state, score, label, alert, line, or zone should be interpreted as guaranteed market direction.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users remain responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions.
This script is for educational and analytical purposes only and does not provide financial advice.
📚 Educational Note
The script is designed to make volatile candles easier to review by separating stop-run behavior, expansion behavior, and cooldown context into a clean visual planning workflow.
Indicateur
Breakout Failure Recovery [AGPro Series]Breakout Failure Recovery
🧠 Core Idea
After a failed breakout, is price recovering through the reclaim level or confirming the failure?
📌 Overview / What it does
Breakout Failure Recovery is a chart-first failed-breakout lifecycle planner built to evaluate what happens after price probes outside a recent range and closes back inside.
The script maps a failure box, reclaim trigger, risk shelf, recovery/rejection labels, and a compact AGPro panel. It converts close-back-inside behavior, reclaim speed, retest response, volume behavior, and time decay into a 0-100 Recovery Score with a clear next-action state.
It does not predict the next move, automate execution, or act as a generic failed-break signal. Its purpose is to organize the post-failure decision context.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who do not want to treat every failed breakout the same way.
Some failed breaks recover quickly through the original breakout level. Others reject the boundary, lose time, and confirm that the attempt has failed. This tool focuses on that decision window.
The design supports a planner mindset: identify the failure, measure the reclaim attempt, locate the risk shelf, and decide whether the context deserves review or should be downgraded.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools mark a failed break as a single event.
This script does NOT stop at the failed-break label, does not clone a Swing Failure Pattern engine, and does not become a generic breakout-failure signal board.
Instead, it evaluates the recovery path after the failure. The main output is a recovery state: Recovery Active, Recovery Watch, Failure Confirmed, Reclaim Pending, Window Decaying, or No Active Failure.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script builds a recent range from prior bars and checks whether price probes beyond the upper or lower boundary before closing back inside.
2. Reference Mapping
When a failed break appears, it maps the failure box, reclaim trigger, and risk shelf around the failed boundary.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The model scores close-back-inside quality, reclaim speed, retest response, volume behavior, and time decay.
4. Visual Output
The result is shown through centered failure-box text, a centered risk-shelf label, reclaim/reject labels, alert conditions, and a clean AGPro planning panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Failure Box = the failed-break excursion outside the recent range.
Reclaim Trigger = the level that shows the original breakout attempt is trying to recover.
Risk Shelf = the boundary zone where retest response should be reviewed.
Labels = compact markers for failed break, reclaim, reject, decay, and watch context.
Colors = teal highlights constructive recovery context, pink highlights failure or rejection pressure, amber highlights shelf review, and indigo highlights watch states.
Panel = summarizes Failure State, Recovery Score, Reclaim Level, Risk Zone, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Failed Breakout Detected → price probed outside the recent range and closed back inside.
• Recovery Watch → recovery conditions are developing, but reclaim confirmation is incomplete.
• Recovery Active → reclaim behavior and the Recovery Score have reached stronger review context.
• Failure Confirmed → price rejects the failed boundary or moves deeper back into the range.
• Reclaim Pending → an active failure exists, but recovery conditions are not strong enough yet.
• Window Decaying → the failed-break context is getting old and should carry less weight.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when a failed breakout is detected, when Recovery Watch appears, when Recovery Active appears, or when Failure Confirmed appears.
Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions, entry commands, exit commands, or automated strategy rules.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest recovery context appears when price closes back inside the range, reclaims the failed boundary quickly, shows a constructive retest response, receives supportive volume, and does not lose too much time after the failed break.
When these components weaken, the script can shift toward Reclaim Pending, Window Decaying, or Failure Confirmed.
📊 When to Use
• After a breakout attempt closes back inside a recent range
• During range-bound markets with frequent boundary tests
• Around failed expansion attempts where reclaim quality matters
• When deciding whether a failed breakout deserves continued monitoring
• On liquid symbols where range, volume, and candle behavior are readable
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low-liquidity symbols with unstable candles
• Extremely noisy micro-timeframes
• News-driven spikes where levels lose structure quickly
• Markets with unreliable volume data
• Situations where the user expects a direct signal-only tool
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Failure Range Lookback → controls the recent range used to detect failed breaks.
• Failure Probe ATR → defines how far price must probe beyond the range boundary.
• Recovery Window Bars → controls how long the failed-break recovery window stays relevant.
• Retest / Shelf ATR → controls risk shelf thickness and boundary response tolerance.
• Recovery Active Threshold → sets the minimum score for the strongest recovery state.
• Label and Panel Font Size → controls chart labels, centered zone text, and panel readability.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed to stay chart-first.
The failure box gives the visual story. The reclaim trigger and risk shelf define the practical review frame. Labels remain compact and controlled so the chart stays active without becoming crowded.
The AGPro panel uses a merged blue title row and a compact decision layout for fast reading.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state and Recovery Score.
2. Check the failure box and failed boundary.
3. Compare price behavior against the reclaim trigger.
4. Review the risk shelf and rejection response.
5. Treat alerts as attention markers, then evaluate broader market context.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in terms of failed-break lifecycle, not prediction.
A stronger Recovery Score means the failed breakout is attempting to reclaim quickly with better response and participation. A weaker score means the failure may be aging, rejecting, or losing structural quality.
Failure Confirmed does not mean the market must continue in one direction. It means the failed-break attempt is not recovering cleanly within the current rule set.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not auto trading
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a generic failed-break signal
• Not a Swing Failure Pattern clone
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
The script is rule-based and depends on recent price, volatility, range, volume, and candle behavior.
Different timeframes can change how failure and recovery appear. Volatility spikes can temporarily distort boundary behavior. Symbols with unreliable volume may produce weaker participation readings.
Outputs should always be interpreted with broader market structure, liquidity, and risk context.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Failed breakouts are most useful when the boundary is readable and the follow-up reaction is clear.
A quick reclaim can show that the failed attempt is recovering. A weak retest, slow response, or deep move back into the range can show that the failed break is confirming instead.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price probes above a range, closes back inside, then quickly reclaims the upper boundary with supportive volume, the planner may classify the context as Recovery Active.
When price probes above a range, closes back inside, retests the boundary from below, and rejects again, the planner may classify the context as Failure Confirmed.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGPro planning tools are designed to help traders evaluate context before reacting.
This script follows that philosophy by turning failed breakouts into a structured decision question: is the attempt recovering, aging, or confirming failure?
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can provide certainty.
This tool provides structured visual context and rule-based attention markers. It does not guarantee continuation, reversal, recovery, or rejection.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk. Market conditions can change quickly, and no script can remove uncertainty.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions.
This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice.
📚 Educational Note
Use the planner to study how failed breakouts behave after the first rejection, how reclaim speed affects context, and how risk shelves help organize post-failure review.
Indicateur
Impulse Follow-Through Quality [AGPro Series]Impulse Follow-Through Quality
🧠 Core Idea
Did the impulse receive enough follow-through to remain valid?
📌 Overview / What it does
Impulse Follow-Through Quality is a chart-first momentum expansion planner built to evaluate what happens after a strong impulse candle appears.
Instead of treating every strong candle as a standalone signal, the script starts a follow-through review window and measures whether price extends, pauses constructively, pulls back too deeply, reaches a target-room guide, or crosses a failure rail. These elements are converted into a 0-100 Impulse Quality score and a clear next-action state.
The script produces an impulse highlight, follow-through box, failure rail, measured target guide, compact labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro planning panel. It does not predict continuation, automate trades, or guarantee that momentum will continue.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who want to separate a meaningful impulse from a candle that only looks strong for one bar.
Many momentum tools focus on the impulse itself. The practical question often comes after that candle: does the move attract follow-through, or does it begin to fail? This planner fills that gap by turning the post-impulse phase into a readable decision process.
The design supports a patient review mindset: identify the impulse, watch the follow-through window, evaluate pullback depth, check target room, and review the failure rail before reacting.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on strong candles, volume spikes, momentum bursts, or basic continuation labels.
This script does NOT act as a Volume Climax Detector, does NOT rebuild an Institutional Candle Detector, and does NOT reduce the chart to a simple buy/sell momentum signal.
Instead, it evaluates what happens after the impulse. The key output is not the candle itself. The key output is the follow-through quality state: IMPULSE, WAIT FT, FT WATCH, VALID FT, PULLBACK RISK, WEAK FT, FAILED, or TARGET REVIEW.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script detects qualified bullish or bearish impulse candles using ATR-normalized range, body efficiency, close location, trend context, and participation.
2. Reference Mapping
Once an impulse qualifies, the script maps the impulse origin, follow-through box, failure rail, and target-room guide.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The model evaluates follow-through progress, closes beyond the impulse close, retracement depth, participation support, target room, and whether price crosses the failure rail.
4. Visual Output
The result is displayed through an impulse highlight, centered follow-through box label, failure rail, target guide, compact labels, deterministic alerts, and a premium AGPro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Impulse Highlight = the latest qualified impulse leg that starts the review window.
Follow-Through Box = the active planning area between the impulse close and the measured target-room guide. Its label is centered inside the box.
Failure Rail = the practical invalidation reference behind the impulse. It is an analytical line, not a stop order.
Target Guide = a measured target-room reference based on the impulse range.
Labels = compact state markers for impulse start, constructive follow-through, weak follow-through, pullback risk, failure rail review, and target review.
Colors = teal supports constructive long-side follow-through, pink supports short-side or failure context, amber marks review risk, and indigo marks watch states.
Panel = summarizes Impulse Quality, Follow-Through, Pullback Risk, Target Room, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• IMPULSE → a qualified impulse candle has started a review window.
• WAIT FT → the impulse exists, but follow-through is not confirmed yet.
• FT WATCH → follow-through conditions are improving but not strong enough for the highest state.
• VALID FT → follow-through quality is constructive according to the rule set.
• PULLBACK RISK → retracement depth is elevated inside the impulse range.
• WEAK FT → the follow-through window is aging without enough progress.
• FAILED → price crossed the failure rail behind the impulse.
• TARGET REVIEW → price reached the measured target-room guide and context should be reviewed.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts can trigger when a new impulse starts, follow-through becomes constructive, follow-through enters watch state, the move weakens, pullback risk rises, price crosses the failure rail, or price reaches the target-room guide.
Each alert is an attention marker. Alerts are not trade instructions, entry commands, exit commands, or automated strategy rules.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest context appears when a clean impulse candle is followed by measurable progress, multiple closes beyond the impulse close, controlled retracement depth, supportive participation, and readable target room.
When these components weaken, the planner can shift toward WAIT FT, FT WATCH, PULLBACK RISK, WEAK FT, or FAILED.
📊 When to Use
• After strong momentum candles where continuation quality matters.
• During trend continuation attempts that need follow-through review.
• After breakout or expansion bars where a one-bar move may be misleading.
• On liquid symbols where ATR, candle structure, and volume behavior are readable.
• When you want a post-impulse planning map instead of another raw momentum signal.
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low-liquidity symbols with unstable candles or unreliable volume.
• Extremely noisy micro-timeframes where impulse candles appear too frequently.
• News-driven spikes where one-bar expansion can distort the model.
• Markets with large gaps that make ATR and failure-rail references less useful.
• Situations where the user expects guaranteed continuation or automated trade signals.
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Follow-Through Side → controls Auto, Long Follow-Through, or Short Follow-Through mode.
• Minimum Impulse ATR → changes how large a candle must be before review begins.
• Minimum Body Efficiency → controls how clean the impulse body must be.
• Minimum Edge Close → controls how near the candle must close to its directional edge.
• Follow-Through Window → controls how many bars are used to judge early continuation.
• Required Progress ATR → defines preferred movement after the impulse close.
• Maximum Pullback Ratio → controls when retracement depth becomes elevated risk.
• Failure Rail Buffer ATR → adjusts the analytical failure rail behind the impulse.
• Visual settings → control the impulse highlight, follow-through box, failure rail, target guide, labels, panel visibility, panel location, theme, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed to stay chart-first.
The impulse highlight gives the origin. The follow-through box gives the active planning area. The failure rail and target guide define the practical review frame.
The AGPro panel provides a compact decision summary with a merged blue title row, adjustable panel location, adjustable theme, and adjustable font size.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel Impulse Quality score and Action.
2. Check the impulse highlight and the direction of the follow-through box.
3. Review whether price is extending beyond the impulse close.
4. Compare pullback depth with the failure rail.
5. Use the target guide as a context-review reference, not as a guarantee.
6. Treat alerts as attention markers inside broader analysis.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in terms of follow-through quality, not prediction.
A higher score means the impulse has more constructive continuation characteristics according to the script's rule set. A weaker score means the move may be aging, retracing too deeply, lacking progress, or crossing its failure reference.
VALID FT does not mean price must continue. FAILED does not mean the market cannot recover later. The states organize the review process.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine.
• Not financial advice.
• Not an auto-trading system.
• Not a guaranteed signal tool.
• Not a buy/sell signal service.
• Not a Volume Climax Detector.
• Not an Institutional Candle Detector.
• Not a generic momentum oscillator.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
The script is rule-based and depends on recent price action, ATR, candle structure, selected inputs, and volume behavior.
Different timeframes can produce different impulse and follow-through readings. Volatility spikes can temporarily distort the score. Symbols with unreliable volume may produce weaker participation readings.
Outputs should always be interpreted with broader market structure, liquidity, and trader-defined risk controls.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Impulse candles are only useful when the market confirms or rejects them through follow-through.
A clean impulse that receives controlled extension may deserve more attention than a larger candle that immediately retraces. A smaller impulse can also become meaningful when the follow-through window stays organized.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price prints a strong bullish impulse, closes near the high, then follows through with multiple closes above the impulse close while pullback depth remains controlled, the planner may classify the move as VALID FT.
When an impulse appears but price fails to extend, retraces deeply, or crosses the failure rail, the planner may shift toward WEAK FT, PULLBACK RISK, or FAILED.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGPro planning tools are designed to help traders evaluate context before reacting.
This script follows that philosophy by turning impulse follow-through into a structured planning question: did the move receive enough confirmation, progress, and risk clarity to remain worth reviewing?
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can guarantee continuation, reversal, breakout success, or outcome.
This tool provides structured visual context and rule-based attention markers. It does not provide certainty.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Market conditions can change quickly, and no script can remove uncertainty.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, position sizing, and trading decisions.
This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice.
📚 Educational Note
Use the planner to study how strong candles behave after they appear, how follow-through quality changes across timeframes, and how pullback depth affects the readability of momentum continuation.
Indicateur
Range Expansion Risk Planner [AGPro Series]Range Expansion Risk Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Does a range expansion offer clean room, or is price moving into immediate failure risk?
📌 Overview / What it does
Range Expansion Risk Planner is a chart-first breakout quality and risk-planning tool built for one specific moment: price has left a defined range, and the trader needs to understand whether the expansion has enough structure to deserve attention.
Instead of printing generic breakout signals, the script maps the source range, freezes the broken edge, builds an expansion runway, tracks a failure rail, estimates target room, evaluates retest behavior, and converts those conditions into a 0-100 planner score.
The script produces a source range box, expansion runway, failed-expansion review band, risk/target rails, full-state labels, deterministic alerts, and a clean AGPro panel. It does not predict future price movement, automate execution, or guarantee that a breakout will continue.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who want to evaluate range expansion quality after price leaves a structure, not simply react to the first candle outside the range.
Many tools mark breakouts, draw range boxes, or highlight volatility expansion. The gap is the planning layer after the break: Is the source range mature? Was the expansion candle strong enough? Did price close clearly beyond the edge? Is the retest accepted or weak? Is there enough room before the next target-side reference?
The design supports a decision-first workflow. It helps users separate a clean range expansion from a weak release, blocked room, failed expansion, or early unconfirmed movement.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on breakout arrows, range highs/lows, volatility spikes, or support/resistance zones.
This script does NOT become a generic range breakout signal, a generic S/R zone map, a squeeze indicator, or a target predictor.
Instead, it evaluates the quality of the expansion plan after the range edge is broken. The main output is not a trade command. It is a planning state that helps the user decide whether the current expansion is CLEAN, on REVIEW, waiting for retest, blocked by room risk, or failing back into the source range.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script maps the active source range using a user-defined lookback and detects whether price has closed beyond the upper or lower edge with enough ATR-normalized distance.
2. Reference Mapping
When a qualified expansion appears, the script freezes the source range, the broken edge, the failure rail, and the target-room marker so the plan can be reviewed consistently.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The model scores range maturity, expansion candle quality, close beyond edge, retest quality, target-room distance, and failure-rail distance.
4. Visual Output
The result is displayed through a source range box, expansion runway, failed-expansion band, risk/target rails, full-state event labels, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the source range shows where the expansion came from. The expansion runway shows the path between the broken edge and the target-room marker. The failed-expansion band shows the area where the release may be losing structure.
Labels = full-state markers show Range Expansion, Clean Expansion, Expansion Review, Retest Accepted, Failed Expansion, Target Room Reached, Failure Risk, or Range Watch context.
Colors = teal highlights cleaner bullish expansion, pink highlights bearish or failed contexts, amber highlights review/risk states, and indigo highlights watch or target-edge states.
Panel = the panel summarizes Range Maturity, Expansion Risk, Room Risk, Confirmation, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• CLEAN EXPANSION → range expansion quality is strong enough to deserve active review.
• REVIEW → expansion context is developing, but confirmation or target room is incomplete.
• WAIT RETEST → price has expanded, but the broken edge has not yet been accepted clearly.
• ROOM BLOCKED → target-side room is limited relative to the current risk structure.
• FAILURE RISK → price is back inside the range or close to the failed-expansion area.
• FAILED → price crossed the failure rail and the prior expansion plan should be reviewed.
• TARGET EDGE → price reached the active target-room marker.
• RANGE WATCH → the range is mature enough to monitor, but no qualified expansion is active yet.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when the planner enters clean expansion, review state, retest accepted state, failed-expansion warning, or target-room reached state.
These alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions, entry signals, automated strategy commands, or guaranteed outcomes.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest context appears when a mature source range releases with a strong expansion candle, price closes clearly beyond the edge, target-side room remains open, the failure rail is not too far away, and the broken edge receives constructive retest behavior.
When those components align, the planner score improves and the action state becomes cleaner.
📊 When to Use
• After price leaves a clear range
• During breakout-review workflows
• When comparing whether a release has enough room to justify attention
• When price retests the broken range edge
• On liquid symbols where ATR, range, and volume behavior are readable
• Especially on 4H swing charts, where range release, retest behavior, failure risk, and target-room context remain visually readable
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity symbols
• Very noisy micro-timeframes
• News-driven candles that distort the range edge
• Markets with frequent gaps or unreliable volume
• Situations where the user expects a simple buy/sell signal
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Expansion Side → controls Auto, Long Expansion, or Short Expansion planning.
• Sensitivity → changes how selective the range maturity and edge-close requirements are.
• Source Range Lookback → defines the range used before expansion.
• ATR Length → normalizes failure rail, label spacing, expansion distance, and room risk.
• Retest Review Bars → controls how long an edge retest can improve confirmation quality.
• Target-Side Obstacle Lookback → searches for older target-side references before using the measured target.
• CLEAN / REVIEW Scores → adjust how strict the state model is.
• Visual settings → control boxes, runway, rails, labels, panel location, theme, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built around one primary decision path: source range → expansion runway → failure rail → target room.
The panel uses the AGPro public-release standard with one merged blue header row containing only the script name. It keeps the decision fields readable without turning the chart into a crowded dashboard.
Labels keep full professional state names, are offset away from candles, and are limited by cooldown and max-visible controls.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel action state.
2. Check whether the source range was mature enough before expansion.
3. Review the expansion runway and target-room marker.
4. Check whether price accepted the broken edge or moved back into failure risk.
5. Use alerts as attention markers, then evaluate the broader market context.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A higher score means the model sees better alignment between source range quality, expansion candle quality, edge close, retest behavior, and target room.
CLEAN EXPANSION does not mean a trade must be taken. It means the expansion structure is clean enough to deserve active review.
REVIEW means the release may be developing, but the user should check confirmation and room quality before treating it as clean.
FAILED and FAILURE RISK are caution states. They help identify when an expansion is losing structure after leaving the range.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
It is not financial advice.
It is not an auto-trading system.
It does not provide guaranteed signals.
It does not replace user judgment, risk management, or broader market analysis.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Timeframe differences can change how range maturity, retests, and target-room references appear.
Volatility changes can widen failure rails or reduce clean target room.
Fast market conditions can move from CLEAN to FAILED quickly if price returns into the source range.
The script is rule-based and should be interpreted as an analytical planning layer, not as certainty.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Range expansion quality is not only about breaking the edge. A cleaner expansion usually needs a readable source range, a decisive close beyond the edge, enough room before obstruction, and a failure reference that is not too wide.
The planner is most useful when it prevents users from treating every breakout as equal.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price closes beyond a mature range and the target-room marker remains far enough away, the planner may move into REVIEW or CLEAN EXPANSION.
When price retests the broken edge and holds outside the range, confirmation can improve.
When price closes back through the failure rail, the planner marks FAILED so the old expansion idea is not treated as clean anymore.
🧱 System Philosophy
Range Expansion Risk Planner follows the AGPro Series decision-engine approach:
Context first.
Risk before reaction.
Structure before signal.
Attention markers instead of promises.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can remove uncertainty.
No score, state, label, alert, range box, runway, or rail should be interpreted as guaranteed market direction.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
All decisions remain the responsibility of the user.
This script is for educational and analytical chart review only and does not provide financial advice.
📚 Educational Note
Use this script to study how range expansions develop, how broken edges behave after release, and how failure risk can be organized visually before making discretionary decisions.
Indicateur
False Break Trap Planner [AGPro Series]False Break Trap Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is a breakout still holding, or is it turning into a false-break trap that deserves caution?
📌 Overview / What it does
False Break Trap Planner is a chart-first breakout failure planner built to evaluate range-edge break attempts after price moves beyond a recent high or low boundary.
Instead of only marking that a breakout happened, the script studies whether the move is holding beyond the edge, being reclaimed back into the range, or becoming a confirmed trap-risk context. It produces a 0-100 Trap Risk score, a reclaim state, a break-quality reading, a failure-room estimate, false-break zones, reclaim rails, and target-back guides.
This script does not predict price direction, automate execution, or claim that a failed break must reverse. It organizes the anatomy of a potential false break so traders can review the setup with cleaner context.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who need a practical decision layer around breakout failure, not another generic signal marker.
The gap it fills is the space between a clean breakout tool and a liquidity sweep tool. Many chart tools mark a level break, a wick, or a reclaim. This planner asks what the trader should review next: is the break holding, is reclaim pressure developing, is the failure fast enough to matter, and is there room back inside the range?
The design mindset is structured caution. The script helps users slow down around breakout traps, separate active risk from confirmed failure, and keep risk / target / invalidation context visible.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on breakout confirmation, sweep labels, or generic failed-break signals.
This script does NOT try to become a stop-hunt map, liquidity sweep engine, support/resistance zone scanner, or broad breakout system.
Instead, it focuses on one specific workflow: a prior range edge is broken, the break either holds or gets reclaimed, and the planner scores whether that behavior deserves trap-risk review.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script maps a recent range high and range low from previous bars, then watches for an ATR-normalized break beyond either edge.
2. Reference Mapping
When a break attempt appears, the planner freezes the range edge, opposite edge, midpoint, and false-break extreme so the event can be evaluated consistently.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The model scores breakout failure speed, reclaim strength, wick size, volume spike, and whether price closes back inside the range.
4. Visual Output
The script displays a false-break box, reclaim or fail rail, target-back line, trap confirmation labels, reclaim-watch labels, and a premium AG Pro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the active false-break box between the broken range edge and the failed extension.
Labels = compact state markers such as Upper Break Watch, Lower Break Watch, Reclaim Watch, Upper Trap, Lower Trap, or Break Accepted.
Colors = teal for lower-break trap recovery context, pink for upper-break trap risk, yellow for watch states, indigo for accepted/holding context, and red for confirmed trap-risk pressure.
Panel = a compact decision panel showing Trap Risk, Reclaim State, Break Quality, Failure Room, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Upper Break Watch → price has moved beyond the upper range edge and the break is under review.
• Lower Break Watch → price has moved beyond the lower range edge and the break is under review.
• Reclaim Watch → price is testing back toward or inside the broken edge, but confirmation is not complete.
• Trap Confirmed → the break has closed back inside the range with enough trap-risk score.
• Break Holding → the break is still outside the range and has not reclaimed.
• Break Accepted → the break has held beyond the acceptance window and should not be treated as an active trap by default.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when the planner detects confirmed upper or lower trap context, upper or lower reclaim-watch context, or break acceptance.
Each alert is an attention marker. It highlights a state transition that may deserve review. It is not a trade instruction and should not be treated as an automated entry or exit signal.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest trap-risk context appears when several factors align:
• Fast failure after the break
• Close back inside the prior range
• Strong wick rejection
• Volume spike during the failed extension
• Clean room back toward the range midpoint
When these align, the panel score rises and the state becomes easier to interpret.
📊 When to Use
• Breakout and breakdown attempts around a recent range
• Markets where false breaks and failed continuations are common
• Intraday or swing charts where range edges are visually relevant
• Review workflows that need caution before chasing a break
• Breakout traders who want a structured invalidation and failure-room layer
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity instruments
• Very noisy micro timeframes with unreliable candles
• Markets with poor or synthetic volume data
• News-driven volatility where single-bar extremes distort ATR and volume
• Charts where the selected lookback does not represent a meaningful range
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Range Edge Lookback → controls the prior range used for break attempts.
• Minimum Break ATR → defines how far price must move beyond the edge before the planner starts tracking.
• Fast Reclaim Window → controls how many bars can pass before a reclaim becomes less meaningful.
• Trap Confirmed Score → minimum 0-100 score required for a confirmed trap label.
• Break Acceptance Bars → defines when a break should be treated as holding rather than still failing.
• Visual settings → control boxes, rails, target-back lines, label density, panel location, theme, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The panel is designed as a clean AG Pro planning cockpit. The first row uses the standard merged blue AGPro header row, followed by five decision rows.
The chart visuals are intentionally focused: one active false-break box, a reclaim rail, a soft fail rail, a target-back line, and controlled labels. The goal is premium readability without turning the chart into a generic level map.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel and check the current Reclaim State.
2. Review the false-break box and identify which edge was broken.
3. Check whether price is holding beyond the edge or closing back inside.
4. Compare Trap Risk with Break Quality.
5. Use the target-back line and failure-room reading as context, not as a forecast.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in states, not predictions.
A high Trap Risk score means the attempted break has characteristics often associated with failed continuation. It does not mean the next move is guaranteed.
A strong Break Quality score means the break is still showing participation and close-through behavior. In that context, early fading can be premature.
The cleanest reading appears when Trap Risk is high, Break Quality is weak, and price has closed back inside the range.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not auto trading
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a stop-hunt map
• Not a liquidity sweep scanner
• Not a support/resistance zone system
• Not a replacement for risk planning
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
The active range depends on the selected lookback. A different lookback can produce different edges.
ATR and volume conditions can change quickly during high-volatility periods, which may affect scoring.
Breakout behavior differs across symbols, sessions, and timeframes. A trap-like structure on one market may not behave the same way on another.
The script is rule-based and does not know external news, order flow, or hidden liquidity.
🧠 Market Context Notes
False breaks often become more relevant near visible range edges, crowded breakout levels, and late-stage expansion attempts.
The planner is most useful when combined with broader market context, liquidity conditions, volatility regime, and the trader's own risk rules.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price breaks above a recent range but closes back inside with a long upper wick and strong volume, the planner may mark Upper Trap context.
When price breaks below a range but quickly reclaims the lower edge, the planner may shift into Lower Trap context.
When price breaks and keeps closing beyond the edge after the acceptance window, the planner may mark Break Accepted instead of forcing a trap interpretation.
🧱 System Philosophy
False Break Trap Planner follows the AGPro Series decision-engine direction: score the setup, identify the state, show the risk reference, show the target-back context, and make the next review step clear.
The script is built to help traders make a structured chart-reading decision, not to add another isolated signal.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can confirm certainty.
No trap score guarantees reversal, continuation, or profitability.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own decisions, risk controls, and market interpretation.
This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes.
📚 Educational Note
Use the planner as a structured review layer around breakout failure behavior. The best value comes from comparing state, score, failure room, and broader market context together.
Indicateur
No-Progress Failure Map [AGPro Series]No-Progress Failure Map
🧠 Core Idea
Did price trigger a setup but fail to travel far enough afterward?
📌 Overview / What it does
No-Progress Failure Map is a post-trigger execution failure planner designed to evaluate whether an active setup is actually moving after it triggers, or simply stalling around the trigger area.
The script builds a progress window, maps a risk shelf, projects a minimum progress rail, tracks elapsed bars, measures distance travelled in ATR, evaluates candle efficiency, reads volume participation, and converts the result into a 0-100 Progress Score with a clear action state.
It does not predict price direction, automate trading, or print guaranteed entry or exit commands. Its purpose is to organize the question of progress versus failure after a trigger appears.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who do not want to judge a setup only at the moment it triggers.
Many setups look valid at first, but the real weakness appears later: price does not travel far enough, time passes, participation fades, or the trigger side is lost. This tool turns that hidden execution problem into a visible decision layer.
It supports a planning mindset: trigger, observe progress, evaluate time cost, check failure risk, and decide what deserves attention next.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on finding the trigger itself.
This script does NOT behave like a generic signal indicator, opening range failure tool, RSI failure swing detector, order-block map, support/resistance scanner, or broad regime dashboard.
Instead, it asks a narrower execution question: after a setup starts, is price travelling enough to keep the idea alive, or is the setup becoming a no-progress failure?
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script selects the evaluation side using Auto, Long Context, or Short Context. Auto mode follows trend and slope context.
2. Trigger Mapping
The planner starts a tracking window from a selected trigger model: Range Break, Impulse Close, or Trend Reclaim.
3. Progress Evaluation
It measures favorable travel, elapsed bars, close efficiency, relative volume, time decay, reclaim behavior, and risk shelf pressure.
4. Visual Output
It displays a stalled-move box, minimum progress rail, risk shelf, trigger line, event labels, alerts, and a compact AGPro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the stalled-move box between the risk shelf and the minimum progress rail.
Labels = compact event markers for Trigger, No Progress, Reclaim, Travel OK, and Failed states.
Colors = teal marks accepted progress, pink/red marks failure or invalidation, amber marks stalled progress, and indigo marks active watch or recovery context.
Panel = summarizes Progress Score, Elapsed Bars, Distance Travelled, Failure Risk, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Trigger → a new post-trigger progress window is active.
• Watch Progress → the setup is active but has not yet proven enough travel.
• Stalled → price has lost the trigger side or is not progressing cleanly.
• No Progress → the evaluation window matured without enough favorable travel.
• Reclaim → price recovered the trigger side after temporary loss.
• Travel OK → the setup reached the accepted progress threshold.
• Failed → the tracked setup crossed its risk shelf.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when a new progress window starts, when no-progress failure risk appears, when travel is accepted, when a reclaim appears, or when the risk shelf is crossed.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions, automated strategy commands, or certainty signals.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest progress context appears when favorable travel, close efficiency, volume participation, time efficiency, and trigger-side control align.
When travel is weak and elapsed bars increase, the failure-risk reading rises. When the trigger side is lost and reclaimed, the script marks recovery context but does not treat it as certainty.
📊 When to Use
• After a breakout-style trigger appears.
• During continuation attempts that should show progress quickly.
• Around trend reclaim setups where follow-through matters.
• When a setup looks active but price remains trapped near the trigger.
• On liquid markets where ATR and relative volume are meaningful.
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity markets with unreliable candles or volume.
• Very noisy micro-timeframes where trigger-side loss is frequent.
• News-driven volatility spikes where ATR expands suddenly.
• Symbols where volume data is missing or not useful.
• As a standalone reason to enter, exit, or size a trade.
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Evaluation Side → controls Auto, Long Context, or Short Context.
• Trigger Model → selects Range Break, Impulse Close, or Trend Reclaim activation.
• Evaluation Window Bars → defines how long the setup has to show minimum progress.
• Minimum Progress ATR → defines the expected favorable travel threshold.
• Progress Accepted ATR → defines stronger follow-through.
• Risk Shelf Buffer ATR → controls invalidation distance around the initial shelf.
• Visual Settings → control boxes, rails, prior boxes, labels, panel location, theme, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is chart-first.
The stalled-move box is the primary visual object and contains a centered progress meter. Rails show trigger, risk, and progress references without turning the chart into a crowded level map.
The panel follows the AGPro publication layout with a single merged blue title row, adjustable location, adjustable theme, and adjustable font size.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state and Progress Score.
2. Check whether price is travelling beyond the minimum progress rail.
3. Review elapsed bars versus the evaluation window.
4. Watch for No Progress, Reclaim, Travel OK, or Failed labels.
5. Interpret the output inside broader market structure and risk context.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high Progress Score means the setup is moving efficiently relative to this rule set. It does not mean price must continue.
A No Progress label means the setup has not travelled enough after the selected trigger. It does not guarantee failure, but it highlights weakening execution quality.
A Failed state means the mapped risk shelf was crossed. It should be read as rule-based invalidation context, not as financial advice.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine.
• Not financial advice.
• Not auto trading.
• Not guaranteed signals.
• Not a buy/sell signal service.
• Not an opening range failure tool.
• Not an RSI failure swing detector.
• Not a generic support/resistance or order-block map.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Progress quality depends on the selected trigger model, lookback, ATR length, timeframe, and market conditions.
Different symbols may produce different volume behavior. High volatility can expand the tracking box quickly, while low volatility can make progress thresholds harder to interpret.
The script is rule-based and should be used as an analytical planning layer, not as a complete trading system.
🧠 Market Context Notes
No-progress behavior is often a time and efficiency problem, not just a price-level problem.
A setup can trigger, remain technically alive, and still become unattractive if it fails to move far enough while time passes. This script makes that condition visible.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price breaks a recent range but remains near the trigger after the evaluation window, the map can mark No Progress and increase failure risk.
When price loses the trigger side and then reclaims it, the script can mark Reclaim so the user can review whether recovery is meaningful.
When price travels beyond the accepted progress threshold with efficient closes, the panel can move toward Travel OK context.
🧱 System Philosophy
No-Progress Failure Map follows the AGPro decision-engine approach: the script should help users evaluate context, quality, risk, progress, and next action without promising an outcome.
The goal is not to add another signal. The goal is to make post-trigger progress easier to judge.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can guarantee direction, continuation, reversal, or outcome.
This tool provides structured chart context only.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk controls, position sizing, and trading decisions.
This script does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes.
📚 Educational Note
Use the script to study how triggered setups behave after activation. The most useful reading comes from comparing progress, elapsed bars, risk shelf behavior, and broader market context.
Indicateur
Opening Range Failure Zones [AGPro Series]📌 Bollinger Walk Quality
Bollinger Walk Quality is built for one specific question: when price starts walking the outer Bollinger Band, is that walk strong enough to support continuation, or is the structure beginning to fail?
Many Bollinger Band tools focus on band touches, volatility contraction, width percentiles, or squeeze-style expansion setups. This script takes a different approach. It studies the behavior that comes after expansion: persistent upper-band or lower-band walking, directional pressure around the outer lane, pullback quality inside the band structure, and the point where the walk begins to lose control.
The goal is to make Bollinger Band continuation easier to read directly on the chart. Instead of treating every band touch as meaningful, the script scores whether price is staying in the correct outer lane, whether the Bollinger basis supports the active direction, whether pressure is persisting across multiple bars, and whether a pullback is holding in a healthy continuation pocket.
🧭 What The Script Measures
1. Walk Side
The panel identifies whether the active environment is an Upper Walk, Lower Walk, Cooling Walk, or Neutral state.
Upper Walk means price is persistently operating near the upper Bollinger lane while the basis supports upward continuation pressure.
Lower Walk means price is persistently operating near the lower Bollinger lane while the basis supports downward continuation pressure.
Cooling states appear when a recent walk is no longer fully active, but the script is still monitoring pullback quality and failure risk for a limited memory window.
2. Band Pressure
Band Pressure is a quality score for the active or developing walk. It combines outer-lane position, persistence, band contact behavior, basis slope support, and candle direction. A higher score means the walk has stronger structural pressure. A lower score means price is no longer showing durable outer-band control.
This keeps the script focused on continuation quality instead of simple band interaction. The chart can show a band touch, but the panel helps separate a weak touch from a real band-walk environment.
3. Pullback Quality
Healthy band walks often reset toward the middle of the Bollinger structure before continuing. Bollinger Walk Quality tracks that reset through a concept-native pullback pocket.
The pullback pocket is not a generic support or resistance rectangle. It is projected from the current Bollinger structure and represents the area where a band walk can cool off while still keeping its continuation profile intact.
The panel can show states such as Awaiting Pullback, Testing Pocket, Clean Hold, or Weak Reset. This helps distinguish a controlled continuation reset from a walk that is losing quality.
4. Failure Risk
Failure Risk is designed to catch the moment when an active or recently active band walk starts to break down. It rises when price loses the outer lane, pressure falls, the basis slope weakens, or price begins to threaten the Bollinger basis.
The failure label is intentionally restrained. It appears only on fresh failure events, so the chart remains clean and readable instead of filling with repeated warnings.
🎯 Core Features
- Outer-band walk detection for upper and lower Bollinger continuation phases
- Band pressure scoring based on lane position, persistence, slope support, and band contact behavior
- Pullback-to-band quality state for continuation resets
- Projected pullback pockets that show where a healthy walk can reset without losing structure
- Failure warning labels when the active walk loses pressure or threatens the basis
- Clean AG Pro panel with walk side, band pressure, pullback quality, and failure risk
- Adjustable panel location, theme, font sizes, label spacing, label clearance, zone projection, and visual density
📊 Visual Design
The default view is designed for a clean public TradingView chart.
The script displays Bollinger Bands, highlights the active walk track, projects a limited number of pullback zones, and uses event labels with spacing controls. Labels are anchored outside the local candle envelope so they do not disappear inside candles or cover important price action.
The chart remains active enough to be visually informative, but the object count and label density are controlled by default. This keeps the indicator suitable for repeated use across different symbols and timeframes.
🧩 Panel
The AG Pro panel summarizes the current state in four compact rows:
- Walk Side
- Band Pressure
- Pullback Quality
- Failure Risk
Panel location, panel theme, panel font size, label font size, label spacing, label clearance, zone projection, zone opacity, and object limits are all adjustable from the settings menu.
🔎 How This Is Different
Bollinger Walk Quality is not a squeeze map and does not rely on compression logic. It does not use Keltner confirmation, volatility percentile ranking, or width contraction states.
Its lane is continuation after expansion:
- Is price walking the band?
- Which side controls the walk?
- Is the walk supported by pressure and basis slope?
- Is the pullback still healthy?
- Is the walk beginning to fail?
That makes it a separate Bollinger Band workflow from squeeze-focused tools. It is designed for traders who want to evaluate trend continuation rhythm, pullback behavior, and outer-band pressure in a more structured way.
✅ Best Use Cases
- Studying Bollinger Band walk continuation
- Reviewing trend pressure after expansion
- Identifying controlled pullbacks inside active band-walk environments
- Monitoring when a walk is cooling or losing quality
- Comparing upper-band and lower-band pressure across market phases
- Keeping Bollinger Band continuation analysis clean and visual
⚙️ Settings Overview
Engine settings control the Bollinger length, multiplier, source, basis slope lookback, and ATR normalization.
Band Walk Logic settings control the outer-lane depth, minimum walk persistence, minimum walk score, pullback memory, and failure warning threshold.
Visual settings control Bollinger Bands, walk highlight, pullback zones, event labels, label spacing, label count, label offset, label clearance, and label font size.
Pullback Zone settings control zone projection length, maximum visible zones, and opacity.
Panel settings control the information panel, location, theme, and font size.
🏁 Design Intent
Bollinger Walk Quality is designed to make Bollinger Band continuation more readable without turning the chart into a crowded signal dashboard.
The script focuses on structure, persistence, pullback quality, and failure behavior. It gives the chart a clear visual rhythm while keeping the panel concise and the labels controlled.
This makes the script useful as a premium public Bollinger continuation tool and keeps it clearly differentiated from Bollinger squeeze, compression, and volatility expansion maps. Indicateur
Bollinger Walk Quality [AGPro Series]📌 Bollinger Walk Quality
Bollinger Walk Quality is built for one specific question: when price starts walking the outer Bollinger Band, is that walk strong enough to support continuation, or is the structure beginning to fail?
Many Bollinger Band tools focus on band touches, volatility contraction, width percentiles, or squeeze-style expansion setups. This script takes a different approach. It studies the behavior that comes after expansion: persistent upper-band or lower-band walking, directional pressure around the outer lane, pullback quality inside the band structure, and the point where the walk begins to lose control.
The goal is to make Bollinger Band continuation easier to read directly on the chart. Instead of treating every band touch as meaningful, the script scores whether price is staying in the correct outer lane, whether the Bollinger basis supports the active direction, whether pressure is persisting across multiple bars, and whether a pullback is holding in a healthy continuation pocket.
🧭 What The Script Measures
1. Walk Side
The panel identifies whether the active environment is an Upper Walk, Lower Walk, Cooling Walk, or Neutral state.
Upper Walk means price is persistently operating near the upper Bollinger lane while the basis supports upward continuation pressure.
Lower Walk means price is persistently operating near the lower Bollinger lane while the basis supports downward continuation pressure.
Cooling states appear when a recent walk is no longer fully active, but the script is still monitoring pullback quality and failure risk for a limited memory window.
2. Band Pressure
Band Pressure is a quality score for the active or developing walk. It combines outer-lane position, persistence, band contact behavior, basis slope support, and candle direction. A higher score means the walk has stronger structural pressure. A lower score means price is no longer showing durable outer-band control.
This keeps the script focused on continuation quality instead of simple band interaction. The chart can show a band touch, but the panel helps separate a weak touch from a real band-walk environment.
3. Pullback Quality
Healthy band walks often reset toward the middle of the Bollinger structure before continuing. Bollinger Walk Quality tracks that reset through a concept-native pullback pocket.
The pullback pocket is not a generic support or resistance rectangle. It is projected from the current Bollinger structure and represents the area where a band walk can cool off while still keeping its continuation profile intact.
The panel can show states such as Awaiting Pullback, Testing Pocket, Clean Hold, or Weak Reset. This helps distinguish a controlled continuation reset from a walk that is losing quality.
4. Failure Risk
Failure Risk is designed to catch the moment when an active or recently active band walk starts to break down. It rises when price loses the outer lane, pressure falls, the basis slope weakens, or price begins to threaten the Bollinger basis.
The failure label is intentionally restrained. It appears only on fresh failure events, so the chart remains clean and readable instead of filling with repeated warnings.
🎯 Core Features
- Outer-band walk detection for upper and lower Bollinger continuation phases
- Band pressure scoring based on lane position, persistence, slope support, and band contact behavior
- Pullback-to-band quality state for continuation resets
- Projected pullback pockets that show where a healthy walk can reset without losing structure
- Failure warning labels when the active walk loses pressure or threatens the basis
- Clean AG Pro panel with walk side, band pressure, pullback quality, and failure risk
- Adjustable panel location, theme, font sizes, label spacing, label clearance, zone projection, and visual density
📊 Visual Design
The default view is designed for a clean public TradingView chart.
The script displays Bollinger Bands, highlights the active walk track, projects a limited number of pullback zones, and uses event labels with spacing controls. Labels are anchored outside the local candle envelope so they do not disappear inside candles or cover important price action.
The chart remains active enough to be visually informative, but the object count and label density are controlled by default. This keeps the indicator suitable for repeated use across different symbols and timeframes.
🧩 Panel
The AG Pro panel summarizes the current state in four compact rows:
- Walk Side
- Band Pressure
- Pullback Quality
- Failure Risk
Panel location, panel theme, panel font size, label font size, label spacing, label clearance, zone projection, zone opacity, and object limits are all adjustable from the settings menu.
🔎 How This Is Different
Bollinger Walk Quality is not a squeeze map and does not rely on compression logic. It does not use Keltner confirmation, volatility percentile ranking, or width contraction states.
Its lane is continuation after expansion:
- Is price walking the band?
- Which side controls the walk?
- Is the walk supported by pressure and basis slope?
- Is the pullback still healthy?
- Is the walk beginning to fail?
That makes it a separate Bollinger Band workflow from squeeze-focused tools. It is designed for traders who want to evaluate trend continuation rhythm, pullback behavior, and outer-band pressure in a more structured way.
✅ Best Use Cases
- Studying Bollinger Band walk continuation
- Reviewing trend pressure after expansion
- Identifying controlled pullbacks inside active band-walk environments
- Monitoring when a walk is cooling or losing quality
- Comparing upper-band and lower-band pressure across market phases
- Keeping Bollinger Band continuation analysis clean and visual
⚙️ Settings Overview
Engine settings control the Bollinger length, multiplier, source, basis slope lookback, and ATR normalization.
Band Walk Logic settings control the outer-lane depth, minimum walk persistence, minimum walk score, pullback memory, and failure warning threshold.
Visual settings control Bollinger Bands, walk highlight, pullback zones, event labels, label spacing, label count, label offset, label clearance, and label font size.
Pullback Zone settings control zone projection length, maximum visible zones, and opacity.
Panel settings control the information panel, location, theme, and font size.
🏁 Design Intent
Bollinger Walk Quality is designed to make Bollinger Band continuation more readable without turning the chart into a crowded signal dashboard.
The script focuses on structure, persistence, pullback quality, and failure behavior. It gives the chart a clear visual rhythm while keeping the panel concise and the labels controlled.
This makes the script useful as a premium public Bollinger continuation tool and keeps it clearly differentiated from Bollinger squeeze, compression, and volatility expansion maps.
Indicateur
Sequential Exhaustion Tracker [AGPro Series]Sequential Exhaustion Tracker
🔷 Overview
Sequential Exhaustion Tracker is a price-action based trend maturity tool built for traders who want to read how far a directional candle sequence has developed, when that sequence is becoming late-stage, and whether the market is more likely to recycle the move or fail back through its terminal zone.
The script is not an oscillator, not a crossover tool, and not a protected-brand sequential clone. It does not depend on classic overbought or oversold thresholds. Instead, it tracks qualified directional progress bar by bar, measures the quality of the active count, opens a visual exhaustion window when the run becomes mature, and then follows the next phase as either recycle, testing, or failure.
That makes the script useful for a very specific question:
Is the current directional run still building cleanly, or has it entered the kind of late-sequence area where follow-through, failure, and reset behavior need closer attention?
🔷 What The Script Measures
The engine combines four practical components:
1. Directional candle count
The script counts qualified progress candles in the active direction. A candle must show meaningful close-to-close progress, sufficient body commitment, and optional trend-filter alignment before it can advance the count.
2. Exhaustion threshold
The count becomes mature only after it reaches the selected threshold. This avoids treating every small move as exhaustion and keeps the tool focused on developed directional sequences.
3. Exhaustion quality
The quality model blends count maturity, ATR-normalized stretch from the baseline, opposing wick absorption, and body-efficiency fade. A high reading means the sequence is not only long enough, but also showing late-run characteristics.
4. Recycle/failure lifecycle
Once a qualified exhaustion window appears, the script continues tracking price behavior. Strong continuation through the terminal zone can classify the sequence as recycled. A break back through the zone can classify it as failed. This turns the indicator into a lifecycle tracker instead of a one-bar label generator.
🔷 Visual Design
The chart output is designed to stay premium and readable:
- Compact count labels use milestone-based defaults so the chart shows sequence progress without turning into a label wall.
- ATR-based label offsets keep labels away from candle bodies.
- Exhaustion zones are drawn as rectangular terminal windows, not generic support/resistance blocks.
- Recycle and failure markers are intentionally short and selective.
- Older labels and zones are automatically removed to protect chart performance.
- The summary panel uses the AGPro standard merged blue title row and a clean four-line state readout.
🔷 Panel Readout
The panel summarizes the active condition in a compact format:
Direction
Shows whether the current qualified run is bullish, bearish, or neutral.
Count
Shows the active sequential count against the selected exhaustion threshold.
Exhaustion Quality
Shows the maturity score and the current quality band.
Recycle Status
Shows whether the sequence is building, mature, testing an exhaustion window, recycling, recycled, failed, or waiting.
🔷 How This Differs From Other AGPro Scripts
This script is intentionally separated from AGPro oscillator exhaustion tools.
Stochastic Exhaustion Map focuses on stochastic behavior, momentum fatigue, and reset context inside an oscillator framework.
Williams %R Exhaustion Map focuses on Williams %R extension behavior and release-corridor logic.
Sequential Exhaustion Tracker focuses on the visible candle sequence itself: directional progress, count maturity, terminal exhaustion zone, and post-exhaustion lifecycle behavior.
It is also different from support/resistance reaction tools because the rectangles are not structural S/R zones. They are temporary terminal sequence windows created only when a mature count and exhaustion quality condition are present.
🔷 How This Differs From Common Sequential Count Scripts
Many sequential scripts focus mainly on printing a fixed count and stopping there. Sequential Exhaustion Tracker takes a different path.
It does not simply count bars for visual decoration. It asks whether the count is supported by meaningful directional progress, whether the run has become stretched relative to its own volatility, whether the candle structure is showing absorption, and what happens after the mature sequence appears.
The key difference is the lifecycle layer:
- Building sequence
- Mature count
- Exhaustion window
- Testing window
- Recycle build
- Recycled continuation
- Failed exhaustion window
This gives the script a cleaner analytical role than a basic numbered label tool.
🔷 Suggested Use
The script is best used as a chart-context layer for:
- identifying late-stage directional runs
- separating fresh continuation from mature extension
- watching terminal sequence zones
- studying continuation recycle behavior
- spotting failed late-run pressure
- keeping sequential count context visible without overcrowding the chart
It is designed to complement market structure, trend context, volatility conditions, and the trader's broader workflow.
🔷 Default Settings
The default settings are built for a balanced public-chart presentation:
- Count threshold: 8
- Quality threshold: 62
- Trend alignment: enabled
- Count label mode: Mature Milestones
- Count label start: 6
- Minimum label spacing: 8 bars
- Exhaustion zones: enabled
- Panel: enabled
- Label and panel font sizes: Normal
These defaults aim to keep the chart informative without turning it into a noisy label wall.
🔷 Why It Was Built
Directional markets often move in phases. Early movement can be clean and efficient. Middle movement can be supported and persistent. Late movement can still continue, but the character of the candles often starts to change.
Sequential Exhaustion Tracker was built to make that progression easier to read directly on the chart. The goal is not to call every top or bottom. The goal is to show where the current sequence sits in its own lifecycle and whether the post-exhaustion behavior is confirming continuation, stalling, or failing.
That narrow focus is what makes the tool distinct: it is not a general momentum dashboard, not an oscillator map, not a support/resistance engine, and not a signal checklist. It is a dedicated sequential maturity and lifecycle tracker.
Indicateur
RSI Failure Swing Detector [AGPro Series]RSI Failure Swing Detector
🔹 **Overview**
RSI Failure Swing Detector is a focused RSI reversal-structure tool built around one classic momentum concept: the confirmed RSI failure swing.
Instead of treating every oversold or overbought RSI reading as a reversal condition, this script waits for the full internal RSI sequence:
1. RSI reaches an extreme zone.
2. RSI recovers or reacts away from that extreme.
3. RSI pulls back while respecting the original RSI extreme.
4. RSI breaks the internal swing level that confirms the failure swing.
Only after that sequence is complete does the script mark a confirmed trigger on the chart.
The purpose is to make RSI failure swings easier to read in real time without turning the tool into a generic divergence scanner, RSI pressure map, or broad reversal dashboard.
🔹 **What Makes It Different**
Most RSI tools focus on one of three common ideas:
- RSI overbought and oversold levels.
- RSI divergence against price.
- RSI momentum or pressure state.
This script is intentionally different.
RSI Failure Swing Detector does not look for RSI divergence. It does not compare RSI swings against price swings to create hidden or regular divergence logic. It also does not measure RSI pressure, trend pressure, or directional dominance.
Its job is narrower and cleaner:
**It detects when RSI builds a classic failure swing sequence and then confirms that sequence through an internal RSI swing break.**
That keeps the tool separated from existing AGPro momentum scripts such as RSI Pressure Map, Stochastic Exhaustion Map, Multi-Oscillator Consensus Engine, Divergence Stack Scanner, and broader reversal-quality tools. The analytical lane here is not "is pressure building?" or "is price diverging?" The lane is:
**Has RSI completed a confirmed failure swing sequence?**
🔹 **Core Logic**
The bullish model starts when RSI moves into the oversold zone. The script then tracks the first recovery leg, waits for a pullback that stays meaningfully above the original RSI low, and confirms the pattern only when RSI breaks the recovery high.
The bearish model works in the opposite direction. It starts when RSI moves into the overbought zone, tracks the first reaction leg, waits for a bounce that stays meaningfully below the original RSI high, and confirms the pattern only when RSI breaks the reaction low.
This creates a clean four-part sequence:
- Extreme
- Recovery or reaction
- Controlled pullback
- Confirmed internal break
The confirmation step is important. The script is designed to avoid printing premature reversal labels while RSI is still only sitting at an extreme.
🔹 **Trigger Pockets**
When a failure swing is confirmed, the script can project a short chart-level trigger pocket from the confirmation bar.
These pockets are not generic support or resistance zones. They are failure-swing context zones designed to help the user visually track whether price respects or loses the area around a confirmed momentum trigger.
The pocket is time-limited, ATR-scaled, and capped by a maximum visible pocket setting so the chart remains clean.
🔹 **Panel**
The AGPro panel summarizes the active environment:
- RSI State
- Swing Stage
- Confirmation
- Sequence Score
- Trigger Pocket status
The first panel row follows the AGPro standard: one merged blue header row containing only the script title. Panel location, panel theme, label size, and panel font size are all configurable from settings.
🔹 **Visual Design**
The chart layer is intentionally restrained.
Stage labels explain where the RSI sequence is developing, while confirmed trigger labels appear only after the failure swing is complete. The default stage-label mode highlights only the final setup stage before confirmation, keeping lower-timeframe charts cleaner while still preserving the sequence logic.
Label cooldowns, maximum visible label limits, ATR-based offsets, compact trigger labels, and capped trigger pockets are included to keep the chart readable.
The default visual style is designed for a premium public chart: informative, but not crowded.
🔹 **Inputs**
Key settings include:
- RSI Length
- RSI Source
- Oversold Level
- Overbought Level
- Minimum RSI Separation
- Minimum RSI Pullback
- Maximum Sequence Bars
- Confirm On Bar Close
- Stage Label Detail
- Trigger Pocket Depth
- Trigger Pocket Projection Bars
- Panel Signal Memory Bars
- Label and panel size controls
- Panel location and theme controls
These settings allow the user to tune the detector for different symbols and timeframes while preserving the core failure swing structure.
🔹 **Best Use Case**
RSI Failure Swing Detector is best used when the trader wants a clean visual framework for RSI reversal structure without adding divergence complexity or broad pressure-state interpretation.
It can be useful for reviewing moments when RSI fails to retest its prior extreme and then confirms a momentum turn through its own internal swing level.
It is designed to organize one specific RSI pattern with cleaner confirmation, better visual hierarchy, and a focused chart workflow.
Indicateur
